I feel as though specific anarchic schools of thought employ much more nuance in their anarchic philosophies that I could only disagree with points on a case-by-case basis. I'm also under the impression that the general crypto-anarchy espoused on Steemit and in cryptoland, refers to informal permutations of individualist anarchism.

1. I fail to see why that's significant, when a sufficiently powerful centralized entity could perform the same function as a state under a state-less system. Physical force isn't monopolized (ignoring disabilities), it's heavily discouraged the state for civilians. Any powerful entity could replicate such incentive systems.

2 No not really. Certain anarchic schools of thought don't even subscribe to morality.
For example, the prominent anarchist Max Stirner .

"According to Stirner, the only limitation on the rights of individuals is their power to obtain what they desire,[187] without regard for God, state, or morality" source