Anyone who disagrees with you can have force initiated against them for trying to leave without permission?

Depends on the principles of morality of that particular country. I don't agree with it but that's just the way it is

Are you really suggesting that these things are moral from a certain perspective? I wouldn't bother with their "morality" because these things are immoral.

You seriously need to open a dictionary. Same applies to your cheerleaders

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/morality

: beliefs about what is right behavior and what is wrong behavior
: the degree to which something is right and good : the moral goodness or badness of something

What is good and what is bad is also subjective. Depends on the environment and culture. I can't believe I have to spell these things to you...but i guess if you accept this your entire tinfoil philosophy crumbles.

I'm not sure why I would need to subject myself to the initiation of force in order to not have force initiated against me.

Whether you like it or not you belong in a society that rules with a democratic rule. One of the rules is the initiation of force as a moral constituent.

Again, appeal to the cudgel isn't an argument, sophist.

Try again. I am explaining basic definitions from the dictionary. You are the sophist since you use the words as you wish.