Excellent article!
Just one minor disagreement,it is not essential IMO to either anarcho-communism or anarcho-syndicalism to integrate the monetary system.
Wikipedia on anarcho-communism:
Anarcho-communism stresses egalitarianism, the abolition of social hierarchy, and class distinctions arising from unequal wealth distribution, as well as the abolition of money and private property (while retaining respect for personal property). Replacing these approaches would be collective production and distribution of goods by means of voluntary association. In anarchist communism, the state and private property would no longer exist. Each individual and group would be free to contribute to production and to satisfy their needs based on their own choice. Systems of production and distribution would be managed by their participants.
And on anarcho-syndicalism:
Anarcho-syndicalists seek to abolish the wage system, regarding it as "wage slavery", and state or private ownership of the means of production, which they believe lead to class divisions. Not all seek to abolish money per se. Ralph Chaplin states that "the ultimate aim of the General Strike as regards wages is to give to each producer the full product of his labor. The demand for better wages becomes revolutionary only when it is coupled with the demand that the exploitation of labor must cease."[159]

I believe that the real problem is that both these philosophies failed because the time was not ripe, the market and state forces were too strong.
And now we need a different model, a post scarcity anarchism, or communalism. A resource based economy is the logical conclusion to post scarcity thinking. But how to make the transition? Obviously technology is at the core of this
I will be posting articles about transition models soon, And I hope you will participate in the dicussion, because I think transition models are urgent.