You really hit the nail on the head here. Pure libertarianism is essentially property and police.
A "principle" will not be followed unless it is enforced through threat and power.
All those questions you asked should make the reader recognize that defining and regulating "nonaggression" is itself a huge bureaucratic exercise -- thereby undermining libertarian ideology at its very roots.
Upvoted
The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @kermodebear to be original material and upvoted(1.5%) it!
To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!
You really hit the nail on the head here. Pure libertarianism is essentially property and police.
A "principle" will not be followed unless it is enforced through threat and power.
All those questions you asked should make the reader recognize that defining and regulating "nonaggression" is itself a huge bureaucratic exercise -- thereby undermining libertarian ideology at its very roots.