You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: DEBATE: Adam Kokesh v. Graham Smith on The Efficacy and Ethics of Political Crusading
Well I got to admit that Graham did explain the issue that volunteerism may have with Adam's approach to the freedom movement better than Larkin Rose did. Yes it was a good debate and many points came out clearly. I still think Adam efforts are worth doing, even if for nothing else but to wake up the zombie public and never goes further. Anyway, good moderation and will follow.
I’m just glad @adamkokesh finally explicitly admitted many parts of his plan are not voluntaryist in nature.
You know... this "debate" would ALMOST be necessary if Adam had a chance to win. ...which he really doesn't. Sure, he may garner the 15% needed in the polls to get on the debate stage, but there is a long way from that to actually seeing him garner 34% to take the contest. So if Adam is using the American political process as a means to promote interest in, and organize a means of distributing the "Freedom!" book, there is NOT ONE IOTA OF VIOLATING NAP. So please, you worthless nerds who live in a bubble... stfu and let's spread that book around America.
Sure, he may garner the 15% needed in the polls to get on the debate stage.....
In the book there may not be. In his platform, and by his own explicit admission in the debate, there definitely is.
“Stfu” is not an argument, and I have already requested that you stop directing comments of this nature toward me.
you can "request" all you want, boy... That leaves me the option to continue presenting my version of FREE SPEECH. I'll direct any dang comments I see as needed!!!! It's better than knocking you over the head with a baseball bat... a NAP-violating option that is not available to me since you live in Japan somewhere, anyway. So deal with it like a man.... if you can, you old soyBoy. No safe spaces for snowflakes in Steemit. Now go find Larkin Rosenstein and give each other a nice body massage.