Do you think that anarchism is viable for large groups of people? I mean, you said how difficult it was to write with just the OCcupy group which resulted in a product that was, in your opinion, inferior. I guess that doesn't mean that the group couldn't have just decided to outsource the job by election to a good writer whose authority would then be justified. But I feel like direct democracy can and does result in an inferior product because a lot of the time it uses the lowest common denominator.

I think that it can work on a small tribal scale but I'm not sure how it would look with millions of people? I haven't read any of the literature, though, just chomsky interview :P