You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Bezos Bows To Pressure On $15/hr. Keep Pressuring Him. Keep Pressuring Them All.
...We mustn't ease off the revolt against the plutocracy just because the richest man in the world decided to give his workers what only amounts to a living wage in some parts of America.
This IS easing off the plutocracy!
Minimum wage is a tool of the manipulators!! .....you know - the ones you wrote against only a few days ago!
Leftist ideology is corrupt, illogical, and dying. Wake up.
You're ideology is blinding you to your own intelligence...
Minimum wage is a tool of the manipulators? Because they aren't all for taking advantage of the massive surplus of laborers who are willing to work for peanuts, but I digress, let's hear your reasoning behind such assertion. While we're at it, what do you think of anti trust laws?
if you are subsidized by the governments you are part of the manipulators - any transfer of wealth has already begun from the taxpayer.
Minimum wage is a manipulation of an economy - which is just varying degrees leading to socialism /communism.
Anti trust laws are an extension of allowing monopolies in the first place, which is a result of corruption via government and business - it all leads back to the banks either way.
Standard oil for example.
No corruption via regulation = no monopolies.
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch16s12.html
Socialism\communism is the ownership of the means of production by the people, and consequently in America, FIAT is the ownership of currency by "the people", so if you're trying to "omg those commie's" you need only to wonder what exactly FIAT is.
As for minimum wage, as well as anti trust laws, it's indeed a manipulation of the economy, yet you've not explained or demonstrated why and how it inverably leads to socialism. I'll say it again, the manipulators would have no problem with paying people as little as they can, which is exactly what happens when a surplus of labor can bid to work for peanuts, and then having labor laws creates a scarcity of labor, as does "a 40 hour work week" and child labor laws.
The point again is that you DON'T HAVE A CHANCE IN HELL AT DEMONSTRATING OR EXPLAINIG why and how that assertion is true or correct, as it applies to your ENTIRE comment which so far is only one assertion, baseless and meaningless, following another, spawned by the flurry of them in your initial comment, and as the saying goes, I needent explain or demostrate anything in the face of baseless assertiveness, I only need to deny or ask how and why that assertion is so, to which the silence will reverberate echoing back the voidnees of reasoning behind them and making the equivocal statement that if you could have fulfilled the onus of proof firstly and you chose not to then you are content with vain talk and care not for substance.
Anti trust laws are there to break up the chokehold one entity has over any one sector of the economy so that the market isn't raped. Thales recognized that 25 centuries earlier and he realized a complete, total monopoly without any law to his benefit, only resources and forethought.
More assertive nonsense.
Her ideology? You're so lost in the sauce you can't even see that regardless of how many ellipsis you use to insinuate and imply instead of explaining and being forthcoming with reasoning to the flurries of assertive nonsense and accusatory shinola drifting in their wake, she didn't even state her ideology and even though you've clearly not a grain of sand worth of sense to comment on her intelligence, your "prompt" for waking up to the other side of the coin from "leftist" ideology is the entrance to the very insanty of hegelian dialect reaction- problem- solution- that bipartisan politics has morphed from over the last 200 years, where left and right is simply a divide and conquer tactic over the same special interests that have controlled Anerican government through out it's relatively brief existence and which still consolidates it's power from the same age old mantra of controlling the money supply to control government, which need be I can quote the genuins behind the declaration of Independence and his stance on taxes to enjoy the silence that seeks only to leave you asleep and fully confident that you're awake.
#sheepishAF
....I Agree
....so a minimum wage is not manipulation (control), how?
How are minimum wage laws and their predecessors, anti trust laws, consolidating the control over the money supply of the special interests of bankers and why when clearly they not only create more opportunty in the face of exploitation over a surplus of labor but also invite competition in the face of consolidated power?
Central banks control the money supply - and the value of money.
Dress up the propaganda to fool the masses s much as you like, this is a fact.
If you control the money supply and it's value (communism), you control everything else.
You control minimum wage - and how much it's worth - you control social unrest and social success. You control governments and the redistribution of wealth.
You control everything.
'They' give nothing away - ever - they just play a longer game to acquiring more assets.
See the bigger picture, and not the details you are told to look at, and then where to focus all your attentions (wasted energies?) on..
I couldn't agree more yet clearly by your own premise they need nothing more, so the question remains. Also to make a subsequent point, the value of money is dictated by public sentiments:
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2010/10/04/130329523/how-fake-money-saved-brazil
The issue isn't FIAT or the overly simplistic premise of "controlling the money".
The bigger picture here involves actually forming an cogent argument that has some substance, instead of resorting to ONLY silly assertiveness.
Posted using Partiko Android
Why are you asking me that? And .... is the relience on ommision to insinuate which has no place in a conversation, in my opinion.
...If you're at a poker table and you don't know who the 'donkey' is, it's probably you...
https://steemit.com/blog/@lucylin/session-2-fixing-your-own-mental-illness-know-thyself
Actually the question is quite formidable and prompted by the insinuating question you asked and no amount of finger pointing and name calling will change it, and especially so since you've demonstrated a habitual need to rely on ellipsis and assertions without essence. I will follow your link, I'm interested in what you think adds value to my life, psychologically speaking.
Posted using Partiko Android
I should probably tag the monumental narcasistic idiot who bleets governmentatesDePortlandusZaCementorius @builderofcastles so he can chip in from the unipolar and generic standpoint that capital is a solution and not a decisevly insipid setup to trade our worth for shit in classism dating back to Summer and which has seen no end to strife born out of it's designed scarcity.
Oh, on a total side note - did I mention you've been mentioned in dispatches?
You seem to be the only officer who knows what he's doing.. lol
https://steemit.com/blog/@lucylin/quantico-campaign-underway-kind-of-the-forces-part-1-ulog-4
Turd briggade, I like it!