You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Bezos Bows To Pressure On $15/hr. Keep Pressuring Him. Keep Pressuring Them All.
where left and right is simply a divide and conquer tactic over the same special interests that have controlled Anerican government through out it's relatively brief existence and which still consolidates it's power from the same age old mantra of controlling the money supply to control government,
....I Agree
....so a minimum wage is not manipulation (control), how?
%20-%20Copy.jpg)
How are minimum wage laws and their predecessors, anti trust laws, consolidating the control over the money supply of the special interests of bankers and why when clearly they not only create more opportunty in the face of exploitation over a surplus of labor but also invite competition in the face of consolidated power?
Central banks control the money supply - and the value of money.
Dress up the propaganda to fool the masses s much as you like, this is a fact.
If you control the money supply and it's value (communism), you control everything else.
You control minimum wage - and how much it's worth - you control social unrest and social success. You control governments and the redistribution of wealth.
You control everything.
'They' give nothing away - ever - they just play a longer game to acquiring more assets.
See the bigger picture, and not the details you are told to look at, and then where to focus all your attentions (wasted energies?) on..
I couldn't agree more yet clearly by your own premise they need nothing more, so the question remains. Also to make a subsequent point, the value of money is dictated by public sentiments:
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2010/10/04/130329523/how-fake-money-saved-brazil
The issue isn't FIAT or the overly simplistic premise of "controlling the money".
The bigger picture here involves actually forming an cogent argument that has some substance, instead of resorting to ONLY silly assertiveness.
Posted using Partiko Android
Why are you asking me that? And .... is the relience on ommision to insinuate which has no place in a conversation, in my opinion.
...If you're at a poker table and you don't know who the 'donkey' is, it's probably you...
https://steemit.com/blog/@lucylin/session-2-fixing-your-own-mental-illness-know-thyself
Actually the question is quite formidable and prompted by the insinuating question you asked and no amount of finger pointing and name calling will change it, and especially so since you've demonstrated a habitual need to rely on ellipsis and assertions without essence. I will follow your link, I'm interested in what you think adds value to my life, psychologically speaking.
Posted using Partiko Android