US Senate Moves to Criminalize Non-Disclosure of Cryptocurrency Ownership

in #news7 years ago

Ridiculous! The thieves and liars up there in Washington with their Swiss bank accounts want to come down on the people they rule over. Let's not forget the Panama Papers either. Government of the people, by the people, for the people..." is a joke. Our representatives DO NOT represent us.

()

The US Senate Judiciary Committee is currently tackling bill S.1241 that aims to criminalize the intentional concealment of ownership or control of a financial account. The bill also would amend the definition of ‘financial account’ and ‘financial institution’ to include digital currencies and digital exchanges, respectively. According to ranking committee member Senator Dianne Feinstein, the proposed bill is needed to modernize existing AML laws.

Changing definitions
The bill would amend the definition of ‘financial institution,’ in Section 53412(a) of title 31, United States Code, to include:

“An issuer, redeemer, or cashier of prepaid access devices, digital currency, or any digital exchanger or tumbler of digital currency.”

If passed, the bill would likely have far-reaching effects for users of digital currencies both in the US and abroad.

Industry opinions
Several industry commentators have issued their opinions on the proposed law. Tone Vays claimed that he expects a confrontation between the Bitcoin team, including the holders and users, and the US government.

“It’s bad…I think it’s gonna end in a very confrontational way between Bitcoin—even Bitcoin holders and users—and the US Government.”

In his testimony during the hearing, John A. Cassara claimed that the issue of virtual currencies is interesting:

“Senator, I’m just glad I had my career when I did because I don’t know what I’d do trying to follow the money when it comes to digital currencies, it’s extremely, extremely challenging…I think if you look at the metrics, the metrics suggest today [that] digital currencies are a small fraction of the threat that we face. That’s not to say it’s gonna be the case in 5-10 years from now. We’re right at a crossroads, and it’s going to be very, very interesting to see what goes forward.”

Earlier reports also indicate that the White House is actively monitoring cryptocurrencies which could only mean more attempts to regulate the world’s first successful decentralized monetary system. With the growing involvement of Wall Street and the ever escalating media attention, it is not surprising that governments are stepping up their attempts to regulate digital currency.
READ MORE HERE:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-senate-moves-to-criminalize-non-disclosure-of-cryptocurrency-ownership

Sort:  

Hi @sunsquall :-) Interesting Post, and thanks for the info.

And we all know...Politicians Be Like:

They Always Want Their Cut!


I've found your post to be worthy of a resteem and upvote from me. I'm an actual person and I am doing this on behalf of the Resteem - Upvote movement. Each day I pick a random post, upvote it and resteem it. Join the movement, pay it forward - read about it here:

https://steemit.com/steemit/@jackmiller/a-call-to-arms-beat-the-bots-the-movement

Thank you! :)

No problemo, I am now following you too, checkin out some of your posts, I see we agree on quite a few topics! LOL :-)

Have a great night. :-)

Here in Nevada we have a Law protecting Bitcoin and Blockchain tech from taxes: Bill 398. We may be the state to turn everyone else around in this matter.

Guys, we can see under some of the post a crossed the gray line on 0.00 $ "upvote"? Why is it and what does it mean?

Maybe they demonetized the post. That is my best guess.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63294.77
ETH 2638.69
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.70