A hand made hand sculpture was constructed at one place in Dhaka University. Someone will say it is not nice to see, so it will be rich in industrial quality! Gradually hand-folded hands will be known as a special name, and after a few generations when new students will be admitted to the university, the sculpture will become a valuable art for them. But art is only the fame of time?Or art, why does anyone become artistic, and worthless to anyone? So do not realize the art of everyone? Can not everyone understand the aesthetic?

At present, the use of the word "acetic" is seen in social networking or friends. In a very simple sense, those who have beauty, they claim themselves as an aesthetic or aesthetic.On the contrary, some people are pleased to claim their 'non-aesthetic' by borrowing the industry. But there is a whole section of philosophy about aesthetics, which deals with the process of art recitation. The answer to the people claiming aesthetic is true, or non-aesthetic, how much the non-aesthetic, the answers are found in the filter of aesthetics philosophy.

First, let's think about non-aesthetics. The world's most passionate people also listen to the song, the person who is uninteresting also tries to keep his bedroom tidy, the person who is unhappy in painting also loves to see the sunshine sunshine in the evening, is not a glutton and a festive, such a person can also taste the taste of delicious food, the last scene of the tragedy is always uncertain , One of the eyes of a man who behaved naturally, a droplet.These are all types of art, aesthetics, and different forms of aesthetics. There is no definite definition of aesthetic. What is sensual to understand is beautiful, it is aesthetic So what is a man who is non-aesthetic? Is there no connection with the industry, is there anyway?

To discuss aesthetics, "What is art?" This question is definitely coming forward. What is the industry, the discussion is wide and wide. Let's just follow the definition of the legendary novelist Leo Tolstoy."The art is the one which can not be easily expressed by man." For example, if someone fails to express emotion towards his lover in simple words, then he writes poetry, then it takes the form of art. According to Tolstoy, the artist goes to the industry to share his mind with the general. But the industry can not always be the means of communication.Hiroshima has witnessed the horrors of nuclear explosions in World War II and has expressed their feelings. Still, someone has written songs or pictures of those events. In this case, the art of empowering emotion, the tool of giving a strong feel to the language and the reaction.

This picture can be nasty to somebody; Somebody's aesthetic; image source: aminoapps.com

At the time of the post-liberation period, a group of artists in the field of philosophical industry would have given the possibility of predictive thinking. According to them, the industry is very miserable. Often, with many labor, many thoughts, many experience using the movie, it can not satisfy the viewer critics, and the artists can not convey the viewer exactly what they want.But, if a cat walks on a different canvas after walking on a white canvas, the random photo will be created, people can find art from the touch! It is not a matter of chance? In this case philosophers have defined the art of aesthetic aid. The industry that is able to awaken the aesthetic senses of art is the best art.

Where the definition of art is so complex, how can the idea of ​​aesthetics of art be expanded, think? It is certainly not realistic to call yourself aesthetics or to call someone else a non-aesthetic if you do some interesting work. Why not, the British philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein said. According to him, as long as we are ignorant of the industry, we have specific definitions of art.But when we start thinking about art, then the range of industries continues to grow and it becomes impossible to define it. WitGenstein has overruled the concept of art. So we do not know how much artistic it is and how much it is in the résumé. And it is also unreasonable to make an informed decision about the fact that we are ignorant. Let's clear the matter through a mythical scenario.

Suppose you went to an art gallery to realize the aesthetics of some aesthetic paintings. Suddenly you saw four pavements in the same frame, draw them in the same color, look at the same picture in the picture. But the pictures are quite different, but their background is different. Keeping the first image, always reading a book, a neutral person in the house, keeping a colorful sofa in his house. The second image is a world-renowned artist.He raised the Red Sea on the banks of the Red Sea and highlighted the activities of the Red Sea on his canvas. The third image is a Bangladeshi leftist politician, who wants to highlight the revolution in his own image. And the last image is an unfinished painter's unfinished painting. He died before finishing the film.

Which of these pictures looks more aesthetic ?; image source: youtube.com

In the meantime, without asking the background of the pictures, if the question is asked which one is the best, you might fail to answer. But after knowing the background, every movie will start to find artistic ideas (sofa, red sea, revolution and some unknown) in every film and you can easily choose one. From this it is easy to conclude that the aesthetics also help in the understanding of the aesthetic.Here's an example of the famous Hollywood movie 'Citizen Kain'. The image of a common observer will be seen in general. But when he is told the technical aspects of the film, he can understand the art of Citizen Keane. However, the myths are not yet finished. Because if we do not know the background, how will we make excellence, we are still unknown.

Aesthetic is the eyes of the audience! "- Arthur Danto

US philosopher Danto gave the easiest solution to this problem. According to him, the aesthetics of art does not depend on the background, artist or foreknowledge. Rather, the eyes of the viewer are the main controllers of industrial justice. According to Danto, after carefully concentrating on four pictures, some fine differences will be seen in them. For those differences, the audience will choose any one.And the eyes of the audience will do the job of choosing this. So, the aesthetics of the industry are not in the industry, the eyes of the spectators? If so, every person in the world is aesthetic and tasteful. Because, he does the same thing, which looks beautiful in his eyes. Then there is a need for aesthetic discussion?

"When we judge the quality of art, we should think of how good it is and how well we like it." - David Hume

Philosopher David Hume; image source: kobo.com

Needless to say, the demand of the Danton could not get place in the criticism of critics. In fact, if there was indeed no aesthetics in the midst of the industry, then all the art works of the world would have been in place in history, or all would have been lost as ordinary. So we have to knock on the door of Scottish philosopher David Hume to get the aesthetic solution. According to him, the ability to perceive aesthetics is in everyone's mind. Need is just honesty.It does not matter when it comes to "who feels good" to verify the art. Rather, it is fair to judge which of the arts is more efficient, which image is able to speak much more.

Nevertheless, not everyone can judge the art. It's not a problem for Humus. People can learn to appreciate the art, gain aesthetic experience, and experience aesthetics. Only the boundaries are delightful to the viewer who started watching the first cricket match.But after watching the game regularly for several years, the same person will be able to analyze many of the cricket's eloquent topics, to understand the true beauty of cricket. It has become necessary to answer some new questions at this stage of discussion. Why art should be aesthetic? What is the aesthetic value of art playing in our lives? Let's find answers to these questions.

In an artist's house in Denmark, an artist runs a strange attempt to examine the moral aspects of the industry. He kept some blender on a table. There was a living goldfish inside each blender. He calls on the audience to say that if somebody's artistry improves, he should switch on the Blender and implement the desire to see something new. The purpose of this test was to examine three things.
If someone presses the switch, he will be a 'sadist' or sadistic person, who gets happiness by hurting others. If someone does not turn on the switch, but it hurts to see others doing it (because the fish will die cruelly), then they are 'Moralists'. And who will not switch but will enjoy seeing others, he is a 'vaira', who enjoys seeing others' grief.

If you were in the audience queue, did you move on to switch? image source: youtube.com

The main objective of this test was to consider the moral aspects of the industry. The reason behind considering whether the industry was morally or morally, was the reason behind it. It is often seen that in the name of art, distorted sexuality, cruelty and various insensitive issues are being carried out. Thousands of years ago, the philosopher Plato has questioned whether this work is correct.
According to him, the aesthetics of the industry play with human emotions. So art must definitely protect morality. Otherwise, immoral content will start to control human emotions. And if this happens then there will be no doubt about the overall situation of the society.

"One form of art is the way to escape from reality!" - R. G. Collingwood

The British philosopher Collingwood gave the best solution for a few years ago, about the different superstitions being named as an industrial name. According to him, two types of art One is 'amusement art' or the entertaining industry and the other is 'magic art' or superior art. Note that, by the word 'magic', he is not magic, but the superiority.Recreational art is the art that takes away people from reality for some time in this world of distress disaster in a maze world. Magic magic on the other hand helps people to understand the reality better. For example, Hollywood's superb action movie 'Terminator' is an entertaining movie for Collingwood, which will take you to another world for some time and will give you a good look.On the other hand, movies such as Truman Shaw are the best art that will show the finer aspects of reality with your fingers. According to Collingwood, the aesthetics of the industry are certainly in the finest industry. The art of entertainment for her is not artistic, she does not find aesthetics between her.

Philosopher RJ Collingwood; image source: famousfix.com

Those who believe that artistic aesthetics of art, artists can not deliberately obsess about aesthetics, they have put forward the counter-principles of Collingwood theory. Take the case of 'Harry Potter'. Collingwood might say that the reality-free Hogwarts only help us to forget our frustration and fatigue for some time.But critics have claimed that they have got to learn a lot in Harry Potter films, such as friendship, humanism, the need for intelligence, etc. So what is the solution? Callingwood, which is called amusement, is there any chance of aesthetic?

In 2011, Wildlife photographer David Slatter went to a forest in Indonesia to take a photograph of a monkey.Suddenly, taking a slutter camera from a monkey named Naruto, and accidentally picked up some pictures, which later got praise as aesthetic. The question is, artists have contributed behind this aesthetic or just a whole incident? A group of people went to the court because the income of these pictures should go to the monkeys altogether.But Slater argued that if he did not keep the cameras in the right place at the right time, how could the monkey get the opportunity to take it? Since there is no way to avoid this argument, then it has to be decided that the aesthetic effects of art and the idea of ​​the artist, both work equally.
Selatu of Naruto; image source: time.com

The aesthetic requirement of the industry remains the last. This requirement has been known since 2000 years ago, for the welfare of Aristotle. He created the theory of 'catharsis' to show the need for aesthetical art. When someone is away from emotional issues for a long time, he feels very passionate about those emotional moments.If this interest is not satisfied in any way, he wants to please himself in an immoral way. And in this way moral decline in society occurs. However, the aestheticity of the industry can satisfy people who fail to find human emotions in real life. The pleasure of the human mind through the rejoicing of the industry, the feelings of sadness are alive and refreshing. This reduces the likelihood of going astray. Aristotle named the process catharsis, or graft.

Aristotle's catharsis theory; image source: engliterarium.com

For a long time, a man who is outside his wife's consciences will be able to increase his sexual desires. According to Aristotle, the painting of an aesthetic woman would greatly reduce her desire. In the context of the present time, we can see many of the movies that we want to do but we can not, but we do not get it. When watching these films, our subconscious mind tastes the taste of the fairytale character of the movie.As a result, the latent desires of our mind can be eroded in the process of formation before it gets distorted. Just like seeing an aesthetic picture on the canvas, that person gets the power of communicating sexual needs. However, these catharsis will happen as long as artwork is aesthetic. It will help to distort human minds against artificial pain due to cataract loss.

At the end of this long discussion, we can decide that there is no alternative to artisans and aesthetics in human life.Again, the obsessive art of aesthetics can not be any superior art. However, since aestheticity is impersonal, it does not have any specific criteria to measure it. However, morality has a spiritual relationship with the aesthetics of most philosophers. The art is still aesthetic, when it realizes reality, makes it more realistic, to establish ethics first. Aesthetic art does not always provoke people to be immoral. In other words, the art of art is not aesthetic, it is not aesthetic.