You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: @Drakos making threat of censorship.
Then explain why you and @wackou considered my "condition" (notice of intent) as threats?
They were not conditions as I never asked nothing of you and and your cult apart from :
@Grumpycat expect in exchange from #the-alliance and it's member to stop making claims that @grumpycat targets poor people (minnows) any more than whales without evidence. @Sneaky-ninja and @Honeybeee's lazy asses with $900,000.00 account making about 1100.00 USD per day selling vote on total garbage (and sometime charities) is far from being a minnow and has been and will remain the main target.
Doood. There was countless amounts of evidence (especially from @the-resistance). You hit people that had just started on the platform and weren't even a week old and those were a majority of who you hit. You hit them based on the bots they used which they had no knowledge you were doing. There was no warning. You took their rewards because of something someone else did. That's bad faith.
Absolutely agree !!
Because you were threatening to flag people totally unrelated to this with a lame 72h ultimatum.
It was a courtesy to make @wackou aware of my rules of engagement before acting.
(ICO) WELL - Airbnb of Healthcare
powered by blockchain
https://goo.gl/VtQ6rF ----- WEBSITE
Excuse me for advertising. It is necessary to earn. I'll try to stop soon. :)