I'm confused. The video showed repeated examples of violence and riots. The sentiment of the video was that such violence was bad.

Do you disagree?

At the end the narrator said the best opposition to this onslaught of violence was truth.

Is that bad?

I'm just wondering why it is the NRA that is the bad guy here.

I'm not seeing it. I am seeing that they are saying violence and demonization is bad, and that the way to combat that is 'truth' - not guns, not violence in return, but facts. I'd like to better understand your understanding of the issue, because I'm unable to grasp it.

I really mean exactly what I am saying, and I'm not trying to imply anything about political parties, movements, or anything other than the precise meaning of the words I wrote.

Please do help me to understand.

Thanks!