QUESTION EVERYTHING!
Where are the studies?
Who are the scientist?
What does science prove? Science supported smoking cigarettes and doctors recommended them!
What if the claims are false ?
E=mc2 ? Tesla has something to say about that ;)
Most studies are funded by a pharmaceutical companies.
What is real proof ?
What if the Observer is wrong ? Or being paid to lie ? Incentives? Bonuses?
Are studies done properly ?
The egg is good no the egg is bad ?
Cholesterol is bad?
Milk does the body good ? Yes for babies!
Science is making our food, fats , oils , sugar and chemicals to spray on our food and in the air.
Science makes Bioweapons!
Science is Observations? Tests? Experiments? Beliefs? Publications? Hypothesis? Theories? Predictions?
Do people read the inserts ?
In the package insert for Fluarix, GlaxoSmithKline specifically mentions that they cannot guarantee that their flu vaccine will not damage your fertility: “FLUARIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.” Thanks to foolishly passed laws by the U.S. government, you will not be able to sue anyone if it does leave you infertile. (Polysorbate 80).
Why are there so many side effects from drugs and vaccines ?
How many deaths are approved?
Black box warning ?
What Do these doctors learn about vaccines in medical school?
Do these doctors just blindly trust drug thugs?
Where is the true double blind placebo controlled study on this mandated schedule?
What about the synergistic toxic effects of combining any of these vaccines? Not to mention environmental insults , antibiotics, or with regard to genetic susceptibilities like MTHFR gene mutation.
Transsulfuration (such as CBS 699t),
Glutathione production and utilization (such as GSTM1), and
Pathogen Load (such as HLA-DR15).
C282Y gene
Unvaccinated vs Vaccinated?
Are we the studies? Does anyone understand German ?
Salzburger Elternstudie (Survey of / by parents) (2001-2005)
— Results: Unvaccinated children -- virtually no asthma; vaccinated 1 in 10; and three to five times less Neurodermatitis - http://www.impf-portal.de/aktuell/fragebo/fraboaus10.doc
— Englische Kohortenstudie (1988 - 1999)
— Results: Vaccinated children are up to 14 times more likely to have asthma than the unvaccinated and up to nine times more likely to have skin problems. http://www.impf-report.de/jahrgang/2005/02.htm#06
— Langzeitstudie in Guinea-Bissau
— Results: The death rate for unvaccinated children is about half that of the vaccinated. - http://www.ratio2000.de/gesundheit/news/news0104.htm
— Schwedische Studie an Waldorfschulen
— Results: Unvaccinated kids have a lower risk of Allergies http://www.waldorflibrary.org/journal_articles/rb5103.pdf
— Neuseeländische Umfrage (survey) (1992)
— Results: Unvaccinated kids are five times less likely to have asthma than the vaccinated, 2.5 times less likely to have skin problems and 8 times less likely to be hyperactive. - http://www.ias.org.nz/prelim_survey_results.htm
When they do studies what animals do they use? Remember animals age different than humans. So if the harm isn't right away what does that mean?
Do these Doctors recognize ischemic strokes?
Do they know the difference between SBS and vaccine induced scurvy?
Elevated blood histamine caused by vaccinations and Vitamin C deficiency may mimic the shaken baby syndrome.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15050101/
Misdiagnosed
http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cmr.20130206.17.pdf
We do know that it can take 8-10 years for the aluminum in vaccines to migrate from the injection site through the lymph system until it lodges in distant organs like the brain, liver, spleen, and elsewhere where it wreaks untold damage.
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/124/9/1821.full-text.pdf
The British Medical Journal
Only 6% of drug advertising material is supported by scientific evidence
http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7438/485.2.full
Doctors trusting drug thugs for their information
http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7438/485.2.full
What about Sponsoring by the pharmaceutical industry that can bias the results of drug studies right?
Who are they funded by or written by? Just when you think you have proof drugs/vaccines work, think again!! http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/as-drug-industrys-influence-over-research-grows-so-does-the-potential-for-bias/2012/11/24/bb64d596-1264-11e2-be82-c3411b7680a9_story.html
MY OTHER POST
Drugs V's Vitamins
https://steemit.com/drugs/@truthtrain/drugs-are-approved-vitamins-are-not-approved
This post has received a 1.33% upvote from
thanks to: @truthtrain.
For more information, click here!!!!
Send minimum 0.050 SBD|STEEM to bid for votes.
Do you know, you can also earn daily passive income simply by delegating your Steem Power to @minnowhelper by clicking following links: 10SP, 100SP, 500SP, 1000SP or Another amount
You got a 1.04% upvote from @mercurybot courtesy of @truthtrain!
Wow greate article!
You just got a 11.76% upvote from @postdoctor!
Thanks for using the @postdoctor service!
Very nice post
Nicely studied "the study".
Great post !!
Resteemed to over 12000 followers and 100% upvoted. Thank you for using my service!
Send 0.200 Steem or 0.200 Steem Dollar and the URL in the memo to use the bot.
Read here how the bot from Berlin works.
We are happy to be part of the APPICS bounty program. APPICS is a new social community based on Steem. The presale was sold in 26 minutes. The ICO will start soon. You can get a account over our invite link: https://ico.appics.com/login?referral=1fRdrJIW
@resteem.bot
There aren’t many safe havens for real research left these days sadly. I used to work on scientific studies for mining companies. Sadly, if the mining company didn’t like what the research identified, then they’d tell you to modify the report to make it sound less threatening.
I ended up quitting the job because of the ethical issues this raised.
Ty
Science is in they wrong hands
Profit before people science