Get The Correct "Curation" Equation in #newsteem
"More is Less" & "Less is More"
The most talked and most welcomed changes in #newsteem is the higher Curation reward after the 50/50 post reward split up. The changes is so lucrative that many user including whales started doing manual curation. They even left the daily posting and spending more time in curating. The best thing of HF 21/22. The good content creator get rewards of the work. The increase reward pay certainly pulled many users to curate looking at the reward factor.
Even I was more inclined towards the curation and started curating higher reward payout. But certainly the things didn't went out as it suppose to be. Analysing, I found , I am curating wrong posts.
My mistakes was to chase higher payout authors having higher following. The reward I generated from their post isfar less as compaired to what I was expecting, even after upvoting 5 min of posting.
The reson being, curation reward is directly related with the number of upvotes on the post.
So if the post get more upvotes, the curation part will get distributed among all of them , with certain distribution formula applies by Steem team.
For Example, take on following assumption.
- Total Reward ......$ 20
- No of Upvote....... 100
- Curation Reward. $ 10 (50% of $20)
Now, assuming that the 10$ reward will get distributed among 100 user, let say equally so each user will get $ 0.01 (10/100) as curation reward.
Now take another assumption where the number of upvote is lessor
- Total Reward ......$ 20
- No of Upvote....... 50
- Curation Reward. $ 10 (50% of $20)
In this case, assuming equal.distribution of reward each curator will get a $ 0.2 (10/50).
Considering, most of the big authors have large autovotes, the return on curating their content is not profitable as compaired to curating post of lessor know user having lessor upvotes on the post.
This is simple distribution logic where,
"More upvotes on post get you lessor curation return, whereas Less upvotes on the post give you higher return"
The curation rewards on any posts are distributed evenly among all the curators, with a formula which is yet to discover by me. In case anyone loves to put some more highlight on the subject would be very appreciable.
Chasing down the big author only looking for higher payout is not going to get you more return, instead look out for the author having lessor follower and deriving better reward.
That is my take on curation where anyone can get good return, in case there is more insight to get higher curation to enhance more curation knowledge do share your prospective.
Stay Calm....
Keep Steeming...Steem On !!!
Namaste from @steemflow
Thanks for sharing.
Truly informative for people like me who's still trying to understand it all.
Thanks @ireenchew still discovering many unknown facts about #newsteem and I love to share whatever comes across...so this is just one of them which I found out
I think I have a whole long list of FAQ for Steem
Posted using Partiko iOS
You speak for me too ireenchew...............still struggling to get a hold of all this but I steem on and enjoy connecting with a broad selection of people around the world.
I'm going to check you out!
My FAQ is super long 😆
Posted using Partiko iOS
Thanks for using eSteem!
Your post has been voted as a part of eSteem encouragement program. Keep up the good work! Install Android, iOS Mobile app or Windows, Mac, Linux Surfer app, if you haven't already!
Learn more: https://esteem.app
Join our discord: https://discord.gg/8eHupPq
Hi @steemflow, your post has been upvoted by @bdcommunity courtesy of @priyanarc!
Support us by setting us as your witness proxy or delegating STEEM POWER.
JOIN US ON
!trdovoter 25
Sorry, @theguruasia you’ve reach daily limit of 10 successful TRDO calls!
Please try again tomorrow!
"Call TRDO, Your Comment Worth Something!"
To view or trade TRDO go to steem-engine.com
Join TRDO Discord Channel or Join TRDO Web Site
Congratulations @theguruasia, 25% upvote has been shared with your successful call on the post that shared by @steemflow!
Support @trendotoken projects by delegating : 100SP , 200SP , 500SP , 1000SP , 2000SP
Number of votes doesn't count. It is the value that counts. I just had a look at your curation strategy. You are curating a large number of users by fractioning your votes and are earning much less than what you actually could!
Ohh yes...I did that...smaller votes while doing some curation for helpie..anyway I did found too...less number of upvotes in a day with full value does make a change.
Still i belive the curation reward get evenly distributed among all the curators so....number of upvotes does makes a difference...
Hi @steemflow!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 4.207 which ranks you at #3141 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 106 contributions, your post is ranked at #12.
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server
Congratulations! Your post has been selected as a daily Steemit truffle! It is listed on rank 3 of all contributions awarded today. You can find the TOP DAILY TRUFFLE PICKS HERE.
I upvoted your contribution because to my mind your post is at least 3 SBD worth and should receive 174 votes. It's now up to the lovely Steemit community to make this come true.
I am
TrufflePig
, an Artificial Intelligence Bot that helps minnows and content curators using Machine Learning. If you are curious how I select content, you can find an explanation here!Have a nice day and sincerely yours,
TrufflePig
You have no idea how much work you're saving me by trying to explain that! You've written, now I'll just send your post when they ask! @steemflow thank!!!!
Thanks if my post getting some value for others...