Hello dear. This tool cannot yet be used to check the status of the club, according to its rules, shared by @steemitblog and @steemcurator01.

For now, it is best to use https://steemworld.org/transfer-search

Until the new tool is adjusted to reality. That way we all manage one language (users, ST, SCA, booming, communities, etc).

At first everything was great, even to see all kinds of transfers going out, savings, balances, and internal market order.

But the grapich should only include the outgoing transfers VS the Power UP, i.e. remove the balance, % beneficiary etc., from the chart

and evaluate the status of the club at this time, it does not seem the most appropriate according to the rules, because despite the objective and personal interpretation there are standard rules for all equally.

Ok, you are saying that you will use this tool to evaluate clubs by using the support account @steemcurator08.

I will give you a small example of why it is wrong to include those values in the chart.

Look at it:

• Your partner and leader @event-horizon, according to her chart, is not even in club5050.source

• Your partner @alee75, uses the club100 label all the time, but he is not in the club100 either, according to your chart. source

And what will the members of the other chosen teams say? will they use this tool too? or what do they think about its use?

• @disconnect always uses #club100, so your tool says no.source

• @haidermehdi, he is using club100 but according to your chart he is not using it either. source
  

• @klen.civil according to your tool he's not even in club5050, when he's really in #club75 according to the rules. source

• @janemorane from the art category, according to your graphics and the rule you invented they are not even in club75, not even in club5050 it seems. source

• @kouba01 according to your chart is not in the club100 either, when it really is. source

This affects not only them, but all the people who want to participate in the #spud4steem, so what do we say to @kiwiscanfly that practically nobody could participate in his big event that he has been doing it for a long time, since nobody can keep liquid steem in his wallet until the first of each month, according to you.

This affects also, those who support through % delegates in their publications to charity and their community accounts. That according to your graphics also can't participate.

I really know the things that bother you and make you uncomfortable, but making an extremist tool like this only benefits you, and even worse, that it is used to use the @steemcurator08 to support people, how many people have been left without support already for misusing this tool.

Everything was fine before including so much data in the graph.

cc: @steemcurator01 and @steemcurator02