Worker VS. EntrepreneursteemCreated with Sketch.

work-1000618_1920.jpg

It is one of the greatest conflicts in the modern society, the relationship between a worker and his employer. Leftists usually have a grudge against employers, and against private property as a whole, and this largely comes either from hatred, envy, or from ignorance, by not understanding the fundamental forces that work in a business environment.

Today I am going to explain here how economics work at the business level, and what Capitalism is, or what it should be. I am a capitalist, don't hate me, and I have been both a worker, and an entrepreneur, and also an investor, so I have plenty of knowledge and experience about this rivalry.


The rivalry is very simple:

  • The employer wants go give as smaller salary as possible for the most amount of work to the worker
  • The worker wants to get as higher salary, with the lowest amount of work possible

RIVAL.png

It works like this, everyone has it's self interest, and usually in a balanced economy, they reach a fair compromise, where both the worker is satisfied, and the employer is as well.

But of course greed, is a problem, and not just the greed of the employer, but the greed of the worker as well. Just as the employer can get greedy and cut salaries, the worker can also get lazy and start talking on the phone too much and working less and less, for the same amount of money. Or the worker forms unions and starts to demand higher payments, does strikes, or even outright sabotages the firm, and then wonders why his salary is cut even further, if the firm can't produce efficiently. But anyway this is not the point.

The point is that in a free society, there is usually a balance between the demands and expectations of the worker and the employee. But we don't live in a free society.



There is something called the Government, that constantly puts his nose into everything, and distorts this natural balance. On one hand you have workers demanding higher salary, so the Government forces employees to pay that through minimum wage laws. And since the workers outnumber the employee, they will get passed, in a democratic country.

The minimum wage laws are evil, since you can't pay people below X. This means that everyone who produced below X, instead of getting a salary increase, will actually get fired. Of course the government could also force employers to not fire people, but that is called communism, and it's no longer a capitalist system.

As long as an employee has hire/fire powers, and setting the salary, it is called Capitalism. But after the government takes over, it is either called fascism, or communism, there is no other way to put it.

So whenever people cry for higher salaries, knowing that they produce well below what they get in their paycheck, they will most likely be left without a job, and then they will have to live on welfare, because nobody will hire them. And then the taxes will just increase on the other workers, to pay the welfare to the fired workers, and so they will need an even bigger minimum wage to fix that, and it's a vicious cycle.

Whenever the government takes over something, you can never expect anything good to come out of it.


THE SOLUTION

Capitalism was never designed to be a worker-employer hierarchy, so I have to hand that to Marxists, they are right about that, however I cannot compromise on the private property concept.

So what Capitalism was supposed to be is actually a P2P voluntary system of private individuals, or private contractors doing business with eachother. There was not supposed to be a worker class, at all. That was just an inefficient remnant from the aristocratic slavery days.

So the working class should not exist, if we want to fix this problem. If you want real Capitalism, then the worker class should be abolished. And while this was pretty much impossible in the past, it is fairly easy today and in the future:

One way or the other, the working class is going away. Robots will replace the working class in probably no more than 15-20 years.

This will put 80-90% of the population out of a job, and this is good. Why? Because having a "job" is pretty much a serfdom, the Marxists are right on that, nobody want's a job, people just want an income, but not a "job".

landscape-666927_1920.jpg

So now, first time in history, we will have a chance of bringing Capitalism to the world. People will no longer be workers, people now have a chance of being individual contractors, everyone becoming a businessman or woman.

Capitalism in it's purest form, is a system where everyone is doing voluntary trade/ commerce with eachother, and everyone is a businessperson. After robots come out to replace boring jobs, people could just buy these robots, and setup their own business without the need to hire anybody.

I imagine in the future people can just setup their phone factory in their garage with some 3D printers and some robots doing the assembly. It would be that easy to earn a living, or even working online, like blogging here on Steemit.

First time in human history, we have a chance to abolish slavery, for real. And by that I mean wage slavery , through robotization, and debt slavery, through cryptocurrencies.

We have to recognize that only a voluntary society with freedom, and free markets can save humanity from the dark ages and the suffering that is happening in the world.


Upvote, ReSteem & bluebutton



button2x
Sort:  

The truth is that nobody wants a job, people just want money.

So why not focus more on making money? Instead of chasing a system of boring and sweatshop style "jobs", when people can just make real money by their own... I can't understand this....

Under communism man exploits man. But under capitalism the opposite is true.

Define "exploit".

  1. Exploit(Make use of), verb apply, avail oneself of, bring into play, capitalize on, consume, employ, exercise, fall back on, find useful, implement, make the most of, operate, profit by, put in practice, put into action, put into operation, put to service, put to use, put to work, resort to, set in motion, set to work, take advantage of, turn to account, use, utilize, wield, work

  2. Exploit(Take advantage of), verb abuse, do an injussice to, ill-treat, ill-use, maltreat, manipulate, milk, misapply, misappropriate, misdirect, misemploy, misgovern, mishandle, mismanage, mistreat, misuse, oppress, overtask, overtax, overuse, overwork, persecute, put to wrong use, turn selfishly to one's own account, use badly, use improperly, use selfishly, use wrongly, victimize

Source http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/exploit

Indeed that is true, it's just that that word is so overused, and it is take out of context so many times when we talk about private property and capitalism.

The truth is that expoitation is everywhere. It's like if you go into space without a space-suit and suffocate. Is the space expoiting you?

We have to recognize, that there are dangers and opportunities in the world, so I think the word "exploit" doesn't actually mean anything in this context. Everyone exploits everyone to some degree. It's just best to learn to live with it. This is just how nature works.

People constantly cry about the employees exploiting the workers.

  • But when the workers buy themselves new boots, they are made of snake skin or lizard skin, they are also exploiting those creatures.
  • Or when you buy fish or groceries or chicken in the market, you are also exploiting nature.
  • When you enter into a bear's cave, the bear will exploit you.
  • When the workers demand welfare through higher taxes, then they exploit the employee.

So everyone is exploiting everyone, this is just how nature is.

We are near to be replaced by the machines and the end of boring jobs ;)

I"m a big fan of the p2p finance revolution and private property rights--something that's inextricably linked to individual rights--but i'm not quite as dismissive of hierarchical structures. Voluntary hierarchies, businesses, and other organizations that are not p2p still add most economic value to the world. Even with growth of p2p econ / finance, i doubt we'll ever see complete abandonment of group structures to create value.

I agree, however the hierarchic structure can easily be abused.

If the hierarchy is voluntary then there is no problem, although a hierarchy that is too wide or deep can be problematic.

For example if you have a small business with 1 boss and 5 employees, that can easily work out.

But when you have a corporation with 1 floor chief, having 100 people under him, and you have a section manager managing 10 floor chiefs, and subsequently 1000 people, and a local director, managing 5 section managers, that is 5000 people, and a regional director managing 10 firms with 5000 employees, that is 50,000 people.

At some point if the corporate structure is too big, it gets sloppy and the corporation becomes very inefficient.

So the system should not be too big, otherwise the bureaucratic curse appears.

That's definitely a problem with hierarchies, but so long as they're voluntary and we have a competitive market there should be some sort of natural size equilibrium-ish structure; or, rather, range of structures for different requirements.

But a corporation is not a voluntary structure. They are coerced into those structures due to labor laws and corporate laws created by the government.

I suspect that in a free society, you would probably not see bigger hierarchies than your average business with 30-50 employees, that will probably be a family business with 2-3 bosses.

For sure the market for business structure is skewed by the legal framework of limited liability for corporations, and then all the other labor, licensure, and economic-related regulations/laws. It's hard to know what would exist without so many interventions into economic life.

John Locke argues that every man is entitled to his/her private property. This includes one's own labor that he/she is entitled to dispose of (bargain with)as he/she (politically correct speech sucks) sees fit. Adam Smith goes on to say that the sole purpose of government is to: 1)Provide external security 2) Provide internal security 3) Enforce contracts. The biggest problem (except greed) is government interference. Smith says that the butcher does not sell us meat out of the kindness of his heart. This does not mean that he is motivated by greed. There is nothing wrong with profit, only obscene profit. If someone attempts to make an obscene profit someone else will come along and put him out of business.

What killed the auto industry in America was unions (worker greed). Without government interference this couldn't have happened. People are independent contractors, even if you work for someone. It's interference that keeps people from realizing their potential.

I have observed that leftists have started gaining power in the 1800's, which was funnily the century when the GDP grow exponentially.

The bigger the pot of gold, the more thiefs it attracts. As wealth and prosperity spread across the US, the number of thiefs grow as well, who just wanted to steal that without producing anything.

The only way to stop theft is with cryptocurrencies that blocks inflation, so that people know their limits, there is no other way.

You got that right. We live in an economy that's biggest product is debt! The whole economy is predicated on debt, in both the public and private sector. I'm just waiting for the debt bubble to burst.

It will but it won't be very nice. I would rather not wait out the economic collapse.

Because with a bit of luck the US can be saved, through massive economic growth.My theory is that the cryptocurrency phenomena will unleash a massive economic growth unheard of, that will make the debt dwarf in comparison, and that can save the US from a societal collapse, and quite frankly the entire world, since the entire world is indebted.

And since the cryptocurrencies are limited in inflation, we will end the debt system for good, this time, and we can send humanity to the next level , quite frankly an utopia is possible.

There is massive potential in the cryptocurrency industry, and it's a pandora box that is just awaiting to be unleashed.

This post has been linked to from another place on Steem.

Learn more about and upvote to support linkback bot v0.5. Flag this comment if you don't want the bot to continue posting linkbacks for your posts.

Built by @ontofractal

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.04
TRX 0.32
JST 0.084
BTC 61656.48
ETH 1593.99
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.47