RE: Witness "pjau" Update Week 49
there are no organizations currently on chain that deal with rewards disagreements
As far as I know, that is correct. I mean @steemflagrewards does have a "bid bot abuse" category, but in general not anything for flagging something because it has "too much" payout on it.
I mean, $9.50-ish on a random comment is over-the-top.
I don't disagree. To be honest I never ever thought I would get a vote at all. The problem is, it is @magicdice 's stake, they can do with it as they will. The delegators to it hold the power, they should really be the people that have the say in it as they are the ones delegating to it.
But anyway, if @steemcleaners got involved with reward disagreements, that would just open up a lot of things, I mean basically anything could be flagged then for whatever reason.. haha It would be chaos.
I agree. Nothing would be safe, which is why I'm not inclined to downvote on the basis of rewards anyway. If there's phishing going on, definitely. If there's spamming and plagiarism, I'll draw attention to it (usually someone already has). I always feel, especially the size of the upvote I could do, that it wouldn't be much more than symbolic, and I generally find a better use for it.
Speaking of steamcleaners—is there something going on? I just read a post from a rather large account saying he (I think it was a he—can't remember their name) wasn't going to help support them anymore because someone there was going after him? Or at least that's what I got out of it.
I know from a different case last year that you and I spoke about that there have been some folks that are overzealous, I'll say, in their quest for putting an end to plagiarism, in particular.
Sometimes that is all that is needed 😊
Not sure who you are talking about, but there are a number of high stakes (as well as low) that want us gone so they have free reign to spam with out anyone stopping them.
Okay. I found the post again (minor miracle). There's a comment made a ways down about "cleaners cleaning cleaners." As far as being a spammer goes, I guess the user may have copied from somewhere else, at least once, maybe more, but he acknowledges where it came from. That probably violates some rule of etiquette, but the other posts I've seen don't appear to be spam to me.