🎇Wow,STEEM POWER doubled every 100 days! What's wrong?

in #steemit8 years ago (edited)

From investigating and analysis, I found that IF YOU DO NOTHING

STEEM POWER be increased at a rate about 0.67%

Table: Daily increase rate of STEEM POWER

DateRate
2016-08-08(0.66%)
2016-08-07(0.67%)
2016-08-06(0.67%)
2016-08-05(0.67%)
2016-08-04(0.69%)
2016-08-03(0.69%)
2016-08-02(0.69%)
2016-08-01(0.69%)
2016-07-31(0.70%)
2016-07-30(0.68%)
2016-07-29(0.73%)
2016-07-28(0.71%)
2016-07-27(0.88%)
2016-07-26(0.96%)
2016-07-25(0.96%)

So, If we have 1000 STEEM POWER, and keep DO NOTHING

  • 💡NO post
  • 💡NO upvote
  • 💡NO power up
  • 💡NO Power down
  • 💡NO other action which may cause STEEM POWER changed
DaySTEEM POWER
01000
11006.90
501410.31
100🎇1988.99
1502805.10
200🎇3956.07
2505579.31
300🎇7868.58
35011097.17
36512302.89

!

As we can see, the STEEM POWER doubled every 100 days!!

It seemed incredible!

In the steem white paper :

STEEM is constantly increasing in supply by 100% per year due to non-SMD incentives.
Someone who holds STEEM without converting it to SP is diluted by approximately 0.19% per day.

So Daily increase rate of STEEM POWER should be 0.19% instead of 0.69%.
And the STEEM POWER should doubledevery 365 days(one year) instead of 100 days.

So, The question is: What's wrong?

Maybe the programmer of steem entered the wrong number?😀

Sort:  

据说第一年是通胀 300%,后面每年通胀 100%,白皮书说的应该是后者吧?!

这个通胀是由什么因素决定的呢?谁来控制呢?

这个问题得问 @abit
: )

abit大神在QQ群里解释了一番

abit 度假去啦

Who can tell me what's wrong?

I'm not sure there's anything wrong. In the quote you gave "Someone who holds STEEM without converting it to SP is diluted by approximately 0.19% per day." That's saying 0.19% dilution for STEEM, not STEEM POWER.

Also from what I understand of the white paper, the interest value changes according to the reflection of it's value on the USD, to try and keep the two 1:1.

It's basically saying that if you just hold STEEM without converting it to STEEM POWER, you lose 0.19% per day. I don't think it has anything to do with interest - it's dilution.

In the white paper STEEM is constantly increasing in supply by 100% per year
But as I mentioned in my post STEEM POWER be increased at a rate about 0.67%, so the increasing in supply is 12 times per year. 6 times as it should be.

I know there's anything wrong, maybe the method I calculate it?

It's saying the SUPPLY of STEEM is increasing by 100% per year, meaning the total amount created by miners and whatever. The SP is interest yes. There is no interest for STEEM, only mining.

explained in my post

steem and steem power are two very different things even though its denominated in steem its just a representation of value in steem not reflecting the balance in steem

not reflecting the balance in steem?
if I have 100 steem and 100 steem power, According to what you say: the balance in steem is 100.
And then I power down my steem power, when it finished, I'll got about 100 steem.
So the balance in steem should be 100 + 100 = 200

That's not quite true either. It takes 104 weekly payments to power down your SP into STEEM. So after 2 years you'd have 200.

Good afternoon. Your article is very useful. I voted for you.

Good afternoon. Your article is very useful. I voted for you.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.14
JST 0.030
BTC 63718.61
ETH 3390.60
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.62