I think as time goes on we are going to fully understand why some platforms can launch anything and bring in 10+ million with beauty on the outside and be completely hollow in the inside. My personal opinion is central banking and their numbers made out of thin air are here to stay. So for the time being we are going to see the same chroneeism and heirchal control of development , but as soon as we people who have seen what can happen when brilliant decentralized systems pull ahead (early bitcoin) and start solving huge pain points for real people we will likely pull so far ahead that it may be the last of we see this domination.

Maybe we should consider focusing more on real numbers and technologies that strengthen human consensus and empower individuals. Genuine platforms that compete against central models like exchanges (biggest controller of what projects will receive funding), and assets like btc that never had a governance model or ETH proof of Vitalik (History rewrite), will always be a threat. Eventhough PeerPlays is different and not a direct threat to other platforms it IMO will matter less and less. To give validation to just one Graphene based blockchain (governance built in) can validate all the others and a liquid DEX is the last thing they want.