So I asked a bunch of media people who "debunked" Pizzagate why they never asked Alefantis about his way-creepy Instagram
As I said in this post here:
I am going to send this post's link to every piece of shit talking head that glosses over the icky bits to say, "Thinking Alefantis is creepy is just in your peasant heads".... meanwhile, we look at these pictures and know something is rotten in the United States. Normal adults don't joke about kids and sex. Especially on a regular basis, while Alefantis and crew... well, let's just say they've earned a massive side-eye from a bigger chunk of America than you think.
Let's start with Megyn Kelly, who did this interview.
As of posting this, I have not gotten a reply from her, nor do I expect to get one. Probably will get muted and/or banned, though.
Next on my shitlist is Linda Wertheimer of NPR.
She doesn't have a twitter, but that didn't stop me from posing a query of the rhetorical sort.
Next is Cecilia Kang of New York Times (also home to Mark Thompson, who covered up for mega creepy pedo Jimmy Savile while working for the BBC) who, like Megyn Kelly, plays a gentle game of softball rather than asking probing questions.
Le sigh. The propaganda is strong in these folk.
Moving on to TIME's own Kate Samuelson and her pitiful explanation that makes sure to please the Masters.
Guess CNN is in extra-trouble since all the propaganda I've covered so far has been attributed to a single author each. But CNN ups the ante with a single story with three guys who collaborated on the "narrative."
One would think that with three people researching/writing, they'd be able to get some facts down. But it's awfully odd that they (mainstream "journalists") never, ever, ever ask about the comments on Alefantis' Instagram.
Out of all the links I pulled up to tweet about, this one is the most objective and I LOVE the comments section.
So here you have it; and if I get any replies by those human-shaped bags of excrement, I'll update this post to include them. But I'm not holding my breath over interaction.
Good to see somebody holding the talking heads accountable! Upvoted and followed!
Awesome. Welcome aboard!
Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.
Want a boost? Click here to read more!
I think this whole piece is an attempt to associate "Ben Swann" with creeps, why is his name even on the Image?, why is the same image pasted there several times?
He tried to expose pizzaagate, this article is trying to make you look away from him and his recent problems with the elite and possible duress, he is likely being forced and cant ask for help.
The instagram was mentioned by all of them, but they chose to look only at the good parts, instagram is not a good pressure point because of this. thanks for even mentioning pizzagate online, that helps the cause always.
Been Swann rates as 0% creepy, as denoted by the mellow, calm color blue. If one is going to measure creepiness, one needs a baseline to measure against.