You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit Crypto Academy Season 2-Week 8 | Cryptocurrency Trading with Bollinger Bands - Homework for @kouba01
Unfortunately @faisalamin, your article contains plagiarized/Spun content
Rating 0/10
Sources
- https://school.stockcharts.com/doku.php?id=technical_indicators:bollinger_bands
- https://forextradingstrategies4u.com/bollinger-band-breakout-forex-trading-strategy/
- https://www.coursehero.com/file/73112047/Bollinger-Banddocx/
The Steemit Crypto Academy community does not allow these practices. On the contrary, our goal is to encourage you to publish writing based on your own experience (or as per the mission requirements). Any spam/plagiarism/spun action reduces PoB's idea of rewarding good content.
Thank you.
These are the information sources. As homework based on calculations and defined rules. So we can only read and write it in our words that we understand. As you can see the efforts on analysis the price chart with Bollinger Band in many places all I have learned from the lecture and other resources. All the information sources you provid are right but you said that it is a palagiarized content is not acceptable as the calculations and rules can not be vary totally we can only use them in our own words.
Cc: -@endingplagiarism @sapwood
@kouba01 I also have an complain about my week-6 homework. I done a detailed research on it and wrote down week-6 homework in easy and understandable native language. Every single person who even not familier with MACD can read and take advantage by the MACD indicator by just reading that homework post.
Here is the link
https://steemit.com/hive-108451/@faisalamin/steemit-crypto-academy-or-trading-with-the-macd-indicator-homework-task-for-kouba01
Cc:- @endingplagiarism @sapwood
Pleass check my week-6 homework flr kouba01 and let me know if I'm wrong.
Dear @faisalamin,
@kouba01 is correct in his observation. Most of the content, its order are apparently spun/plagiarized content by suitably paraphrasing and/or rearranging the text a little bit.
Type of plagiarism-- Close paraphrase
What is close paraphrase??
Ans-- Where only a few words are changed from the original, but the tone and order of the text and sentence remain the same.
See, if you do research and analysis by going through a series of different sources on a particular subject/topic, even if you quote all the references, you are not entitled to project the same tone, order by rearranging the text a little bit, that will find its way to be categorized as plagiarized content.
Formulas, equations, and nomenclature are generalized things, no one will blame you for that. They will remain universal in their format regardless of who the author is.
But here @kouba01 has already highlighted those parts, please go through those highlighted parts once again. You will realize what went wrong.
You have to be your own even if you read & go through 10 different articles and cite the source. By and large, in Crypto Academy authorship is more about what you have understood and how do you explain what you know. We always advocate for "be your own".
Thank you.
Thank you @sapwood for the clarification!!
Thanks professor. One thing that we suggest to add in rules that allow to add references as endingplagiarism suggest too. Thanks best regards
Superbly articulated.
@faisalamin - Simply adding references won't necessarily make your homework acceptable to the professors but it will prevent @endingplagiairsm from highlighting plagiarism to you.
I know but atleast adding it will help to get rid of these types of problem. We can not change defined rules for a method.
The same way you describe my plagiarised content. They're also the same type of Palagriasm in the Lecture post. I am not saying that you copy-paste. You did your research on Bollinger Band and wrote down a whole article using different resources in your own words.
I did the same thing, utilise different resources, and end with a to the point homework with my own words. Here is the document link in which I point out the plagiarised/Spun content and sources.
In the last by these facts and figures, I apologise if I still on the wrong side.
@kouba01
Cc: -@endingplagiarism @sapwood @steemcurator01 @steemcurator02
I don't think that implying @kouba01 has plagiarised his lectures is the best approach here.
I recommend that in future, you provide a list of references at the end of your "homework", just as you would if you were submitting an academic piece of work. It would not only demonstrate the effort you have gone to in researching the topic but would also remove any hint or suspicion that you are trying to deceive anybody.
@kouba01 - I wonder if it would help you and your students if all of the professors recommend including a list of references at the end of their homework?
@endingplagiarism, I would have liked you to have read the student's essay, since I didn't consider rewriting a formula or arithmetic to be plagiarism and this isn't the first time I've made this kind of essay. In this case, the student spun and stole several paragraphs, and I gave you their sources. So please try that the subject does not deviate to writing a reference to the formula or the like.
@kouba01 Dear professor, I am not stealing others content.
I have solid proof on it. But I do not want to point out every single line of the lecture as you have made your own research and deliver us a to the point lecture. Lecture is very useful for all of us but that does not mean that it was pure and use calculation other than standards. Thanks
I understand why you have highlighted this student for plagiarism - I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt on this occasion and have suggested to them how they can avoid being highlighted again. It remains your decision whether to accept the homework or not. I appreciate your efforts in stamping out plagiarism, I know the hard work that you put in to maintain the integrity of the academy.
I also thank you for the work you are doing for our platform, to which we are fully committed and we all want to raise the bar for its contents.
Yes, that will be a next-level quality. If they allow using references for the already defined rules and calculations/formulas. Because if we write down the formula in our own words the quality meaning of that formula will lose or not understandable. Thanks, @endingplagiarism you suggestion is well appreciated.