You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Response to @transisto's Open Letter
A Voting ring is supposed to be a give and take! Ranchorelaxo doesn’t receive anything from me either in votes or ANYTHING except my TA which he apparently values. He votes because he wants to even if you disagree as you can’t dictate his votes. You want to stop him? Do it directly to him. But don’t take out your biased frustrations on me with downvotes on my blogs.
Just like if you downvote my blogs, it’s my right to upvote it to recover. Yet I know you’ll blame me for not upvoting others. Well, your downvotes are a waste for the same reason since you can’t upvote others with it.
That's exactly what I'm doing by countering his upvotes.
By flagging you I'm indirectly up-voting everyone else. I believe that @Ranchorelaxo risk taking down the value of Steem so that you can get your unfair share of it.
I'll be making more money by making sure you're not getting any, simple business decision. I find you very disingenuous and undeserving so that flagging also provides me with a good feeling that money can't buy.
Would it be so hard to tell @rancho to vote your 10x posts a day at 3 day time?
So that on top of taking unfair reward you don't do it in plain sight and expose everyone to the unfair reward your borderline scam analyses gets?