Concept of transcendental philosophy

I will begin by saying that every knowledge is based on something objective and subjective. Because we only know the truth, and all see the truth in the correspondence of the notions with their objects. The totality of everything objectively in our knowledge can be called nature, and the totality of everything is subjectively called "self" or intellect. The two concepts are the opposite, but in each knowledge it is necessary to coincide. In the knowledge itself-when I know-the objective and the subjective are united so that it can not be said which of them has priority. But in order to explain it, it is necessary to put one in front of the other and to go from one to get from one to the other. Two cases are therefore possible. Accepts first the objective and the question arises: how do I add to it the subjective that corresponds to it?

image source

The notion of subjective is not included in the concept of objective, rather they are mutually exclusive. The subjective must therefore be added to the objective one. The notion of nature does not hide the need for anything intellectual to imagine. It seems to us that nature would exist, even if there is nothing to imagine. However, the task accepts nature, or the objective as first. It is therefore a matter of natural science. A necessary tendency of natural science is to go from nature to intellectual. The highest perfection of natural science would be the complete spiritualisation of all natural laws to the laws of sight and thought. The phenomena must disappear completely and only the laws remain. The completed theory of nature would be the one by which all nature would dissolve into one intellect. This may be enough to prove that natural science has the necessary tendency to make nature an intellectual one. Through this trend, it becomes a naturophysical philosophy, which is a necessary basic science of philosophy.

It is assumed to be the first subjective, and the question arises: how is the objective being added that corresponds to it?Naturiphilosophy has the task to do the primary objective and to bring the subjective from it. Therefore, if there is a transcendental philosophy, it remains the opposite direction - going from the subject as something first and absolute and drawing it out of it. Therefore, transcendental philosophy is the other necessary science of philosophy, as naturophilosophy and transcendental philosophy assume the two possible directions in philosophy. The conclusion that we can make here is that the system of philosophy ends with two fundamental sciences, which oppose one another, in principle and in their direction, mutually seek and complement each other.