Freedom does not consist in having the conditions so that everything goes well, and much less in having all the opportunities, freedom is that nobody prevents you from creating your conditions and your opportunities. You are free in both the good and the bad. If you do not accept responsibility for your actions in your freedom, you simply reject it. The people who seek that the State intercede for them to give them "better conditions", are people who accepted that freedom is not for them, after all, slaves have their food assured, and the free men no.

Very good conclusion and really gets to the core of things.

For in the same way that a free man can't be a victimizer, since freedom inherently implies a moral force that pushes man to do good...

I don't agree with this. Freedom, in the context that you are discussing here, is all about the realization that our consciousness is free ( immaterial freedom as you discussed in a comment) and limited only by our thoughts and beliefs. There are definitely people who understand this but choose to then use this knowledge to control others. In my opinion, if we reduce all choices down to a single decision point, it is either Oneness or separation. A person who intuitively sees that everything is connected and ultimately One, will likely be in tune with the "moral force that pushes man to do good". On the other hand, a person who sees separation everywhere they look may very well use their freedom to exploit others who choose to be victims.

a free man can't be, under any circumstances, a victim, since a free man is responsible for their actions, and subsequently, their results.

Yes!