RE: My YouTube Account Was Terminated
First, before saying that my words are wrong, take the time to inform yourself. It would have taken you a few minutes to find that on Google, there are about 9,490,000 results (0.26 seconds) that deal with the subject "Intellectual property GDPR", and about 10,500,000 results (0,40 seconds) for the subject "blockchain gdpr".
Companies have two years to comply, which is why websites request permissions (cookies, etc.), modify the Legal Info, check the data and close accounts. This is not censorship on the part of companies but compliance with the law.
Here are some texts that touch the very core of the Internet and the blockchain.
https://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2018/01/what-ip-practitioners-should-know-about-gdpr-and-personal-data-protection-in-europe/
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1e0b24fd-33af-41ad-9768-405c348076e6
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/05/will-gdpr-block-blockchain/
Good reading!
Well, I only read the first.
And it still holds true: GDPR is not changing anythign at copyright. Nothing has changed.
Okay, I might correct that a little bit:
Changed is that rules are now for all European countries what was standard for e.g. "my" Germany and most other countries.
For example, if you provided for German users, you were responsible for data protection wherever on the world you are.
But copyright (and this was the point) - nothing has changed there at all.
Again, be informed before writing.
There are approximately 42,800,000 results (0,66 seconds) on the topic "copyright intellectual property difference".
In short, the IP is "You can think of Intellectual Property of an umbrella of sorts that encompass thinks like copyrights, trademarks, and patents."
https://tech.co/so-what-is-the-difference-between-copyright-and-intellectual-property-2009-12
IT, social media and blockchain face a real problem: the GDPR, the AML / KYC laws and the laws of "fake news" and false information in several countries.
The laws are
Many projects are stopped, abandoned or awaiting clarification or changes in laws.
Believe me, I am well aware about the copyright, patent, trade marks and the difference between the European and the English-American system.
Again, the author wrote about copyright.
He didn't wrote about patents censoring him and I never said that. If IP includes more then copyright or not is of no concern.
And again, all you wrote has nothing to do with copyright.
And again the GDPR does not change copyright.
Dont throw text masses on people if you want to prove something. Point them to something.
If you cannot do that I must assume that you can't find anything that proves your point and are just trying to make me waste time and give up.
Misunderstanding! Several comments mention censorship. I expressed the opinion that it was not censorship but compliance with the GDPR.
GDPR refers to intellectual property including copyright.
I never said that the GDPR modified the copyright.
What is your problem?
The word because.
It was not because of GDPR, since the GDPR does not change copyright.
It may be because of copyright, but GDPR does not change anything there. SO GDPR cannot be because
Aöö the copyright stuff was already in existance before the GDPR.
What is your problem with that?