You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Urgent Community Petition: Steemit Inc. to Stop 34 Mil SP Powerdown!
I am thus in favour of mutual discussions to come to an understanding between the community and Steemit Inc.
..and we penalize you, if you don't comply?
Do you realize how ridiculous this sounds?
Veiled threats?
Even this being on the table as an option, sounds cringe worthy at best, to the adults in the room.
“Fools multiply when wise men are silent.” - Nelson Mandela.
And fools don't know when their own selfishness transcends bigger principles ...
Bad management and all the rest ?-fine! rip them new one.
Theft of another persons assets?
....Is authoritarian communism, dressed up as moral indignation and executed with a faux moral superiority.
Grow up.
I think you probably need to grow up yourself instead of constantly throwing around communist denunciations! Not every action of this sort is necessarily a communist one lol
I use the term communist to cover all aspects of authoritarian rule over freedom of choice - when involving the non aggression principal.
All authoritarian rule ultimately leads back to communism - just like the system we have it the west today.
Communism = the centralized means of production
Central banks are the centralized means of production when they control the amount of money in circulation, and the value of money..
All authoritarian rule, whatever the guise, ultimately leads back to communism sooner or later...
Communism is an authoritarian mindset, long before it is ever became an ideology, and waaaay before it was political movement...
I need to copy and paste this to a document...lol
Glad to hear you spell your thoughts out on that. You're very wrong, though it's good to see your train of thought.
Authoritarian rule is something separate from communism, which is one form of authoritarianism. That is a very well established fact.
It's clear however that in your opposition to communism you're willing to mismatch that.
Authoritarian rule necessities a continual move towards more and more centralization...follow that through, and you always have to end up with communism, at some point..
A fact? Says who?
That's a big claim... (and an appeal to authority, btw)
I posit that all authoritarian rule will eventually lead to communism...
I'm opposed to authoritarianism.
Authoritarianism leads to communism, ergo I'm opposed to communism, yes..
It's an appeal to common definitions, those things which you check in on the door of a debate. You posit, but don't show, which I guess is fine because I do not have the inclination to school you on basics, just to highlight your lack of them.
I have given you a model, you have given me no counter to disprove that model, just remarks.
Why doesn't my model make logical sense?
Can you give me any historical precedent that doesn't follow the path of further centralization by an authority?
(irrelevant of the label attached to the name of the said authority?)
I know of none, and I've been studying history for decades.
Or do you claim that all historical precedent has no bearing, and is irrelevant information on which to structure a model?
Hey! you TWO.
Even Krapital-ism & DEMOcrazy. Same SHIT - Different Seman-ticks.
¡True Education First! that's key!! "I am an old Venezuelan currently 'living in Vzla'"
.....you don't have to convince me! lolol