Now what's more profitable for the MIC, outright war or the endlessly simmering confusion and fragmenting of the middle east (& Eurasia)? Maybe those cowboys have moved beyond profit already, and lust for blood & entertainment.
Now what's more profitable for the MIC, outright war or the endlessly simmering confusion and fragmenting of the middle east (& Eurasia)? Maybe those cowboys have moved beyond profit already, and lust for blood & entertainment.
There seems to be a persistent belief that war makes presidents great, and active conflict ensures reelection of the incumbent. My cynical side sees this as potentially a reelection strategy.