Before anything else, I must assure you that my comment is not copy-pasted. I never copy-paste my comments I only used to reference the rules. We no more directly reject and approve, and comment that way. And before I score your contribution, I asked the opinion of the community manager of the category, we both agreed on the decision.

About the uniqueness, I didn't check that if there is a tutorial explaining the exactly same concept. I assumed that, since relatively narrow/easy/minimalist tutorials are more likely to be found on the web easily.

But about the wording, you are absolutely right. It was not specific and clear enough. I honestly accept that I made it look like it has the general lacks the contributions in the category have, as I made it about being well-documented, and adding value part in my comment.

I really value giving detailed feedbacks and providing clarifications and suggestions in my reviews, you can check it out from my prior comments on other contributions.

And score of your contribution is not affected by any subjective calls, because our scoring system is working with a questionnaire which asks objective questions to the moderator and the resulting score is calculated by the algorithm.

To summarize, the comment was not clear but the my actual point I tried to clarify is that the content of the tutorial is too narrow or minimalist, which usually causes the explanation quality and volume to decrease. But in Utopian, we score the contributions and only high quality/scored contributions get upvoted, so volume of the content is important in the whole review process because categories like tutorials focus on teaching part in the content, if there is not much to teach/explain it naturally gets low score.