A week on Utopian Graphics · MAY 17 - MAY 24

Total 62 Contributions on graphics category
44 Contributions upvoted by Utopian.io account
15 Contributions was tied to a Utopian task request
1 Contribution selected as Staff Pick

Thumbnail	Info
	My Utopy contribution (TaskRequest) tobaloidee · 14 votes · 5 comments · $134.8
	Utopy Mascot and Avatar Design for Utopian zoltarian · 39 votes · 18 comments · $78.6
	New Logo For What Todo zularizal · 16 votes · 5 comments · $130.1
	Utopian Mascot design [Task request] moenawar · 18 votes · 9 comments · $102.3
	Utopy Mascot Design for Utopian ivannewgate89 · 12 votes · 6 comments · $86.7
	Mascot Design Proposal for Utopy ( The Utopian Mascot ) loydjayme25 · 13 votes · 3 comments · $94.5
	Utopian Mascot Design I by @jason04 jason04 · 87 votes · 17 comments · $79.6
	New Avatar Proposal for Utopy jbeguna04 · 40 votes · 3 comments · $105.2
	Creating Utopy - The Utopian Mascot bitstreamer · 9 votes · 7 comments · $64.95
	Utopian Mascot design [Task request] amirdesaingrafis · 53 votes · 3 comments · $82.30
	Utopy - Utopian Mascot Proposal blankrained · 10 votes · 6 comments · $93.14
	Utopian Mascot Design [Utopy] midun · 56 votes · 2 comments · $83.09
	Responsive Mascot Design For Utopian podanrj · 126 votes · 75 comments · $207.30 Staff Picked
	Hero Mascot Contribution for Utopian.io dimensco · 29 votes · 24 comments · $97.31
	New Logo For Maps Measure amirdesaingrafis · 62 votes · 7 comments · $119.89
	Utopy - Mascot for utopian is a cute robot-cat. fabiyamada · 64 votes · 28 comments · $122.69
	New Mascot Design for Utopy karmachela · 35 votes · 17 comments · $98.72
	HesabFun Design Proposals ( Accepted and Merged ) loydjayme25 · 25 votes · 6 comments · $106.83
	Modern logo for SoundSwitch linade · 30 votes · 4 comments · $130.03
	Swank logo design realinfo · 36 votes · 10 comments · $127.63
	LifeCalendar New Logo batarian71 · 23 votes · 3 comments · $121.63
	Logo for RydeBot hafiza143 · 33 votes · 7 comments · $108.77
	My Icon-Logo Contribution for "FlipCam" of Koushick123 tobaloidee · 22 votes · 6 comments · $97.64
	Design Contribution of Orca Steem Avatar [Accepted by PO] dimensco · 30 votes · 10 comments · $122.89
	My Logo for Piano Keyboard nunojesus · 24 votes · 7 comments · $115.65
	Logo design contribution for Cryptowatch ihtiht · 14 votes · 5 comments · $69.95
	Freetube Logo/Icon Proposal(Accepted & Merged) jbeguna04 · 15 votes · 8 comments · $97.82
	My Design – Logo Proposal - For Fetch chimzycash · 13 votes · 3 comments · $79.51
	My Icon-Logo Contribution to FAKER tobaloidee · 21 votes · 4 comments · $119.56
	Catherine New Logo design masudrana · 23 votes · 5 comments · $75.76
	New Logo & Notification Icon for Epubator yasujizr · 111 votes · 5 comments · $119.28
	Logo Design For Note zularizal · 87 votes · 3 comments · $93.74
	Awesome Podcast New Logo batarian71 · 14 votes · 3 comments · $82.03
	MobileBuildTools logo design realinfo · 28 votes · 4 comments · $77.96
	My Logo for Record-Player nunojesus · 54 votes · 5 comments · $82.57
	My Icon-Logo contribution to "PINKYBAR" (requested by PO) tobaloidee · 36 votes · 3 comments · $118.82
	Logo Proposal for PianoBooster nunojesus · 30 votes · 3 comments · $119.34
	Logo Design for Bimba tebriz · 14 votes · 7 comments · $64.68
	Logo Design Contribution for Gplanner ihtiht · 17 votes · 4 comments · $96.93
	Logo Design For Mobell zularizal · 29 votes · 4 comments · $102.16
	Nusic Logo/Icon Proposal(Accepted and Merged) jbeguna04 · 31 votes · 8 comments · $106.19
	Logo Proposal for MusiQ App gabynnette · 18 votes · 5 comments · $102.91
	New Logo for LEGATO stephenhawking · 14 votes · 4 comments · $104.14
	Logo Design: ChatAnalyzer mugurcagdas · 17 votes · 9 comments · $104.18

---

Graphics Questionnaire

How many distinctive designs were provided? E.g., if the project owner requires 3 designs, then it is counted as a single distinctive design.
[1]More than 3 distinctive, relatively complex designs were provided.
[5]Between 2 and 3; the designs were complex and took a fair amount of work.
[37]Only one distinctive design was provided or the provided designs are too similar.
[1]Fewer than the project owner requested and/or the work invested was absolutely minimal.

Is the whole contribution a result of own work?
[37] Yes.
[0] Some third party assets were used but all of them are usable for the contribution actual purpose. The assets were accordingly edited and not simply downloaded and used.
[5] Other assets were provided by the project owner.
[1] Most assets used were third party assets and contributor did not make additional effort to incorporate them in the contribution.
^{One question was not answered on one of the reviews.}

Did the contributor provide evidence of graphics consultation or other relevant kind of communication with the project owner?
[20]Yes. Communication was perfect.
[17]Yes, but communication was not professional or very detailed.
[6]No, but the contributor tried to reach out to the project owner.
[1]No, no communication happened OR there is evidence the user contacted the project owner on behalf of Utopian without permission.

Was the contribution used in the project? (ex.: the graphic design is already utilized in play store, project website or got merged into the official repository)
[22]Yes and the contributor provided clear evidence of it , and/or the project owner publicly announced that it will be used.
[11]It was not used, but the project owner liked it and considered using it.
[11]It was not used, but is of very high quality.
[0]It was not used as it provides no value to the project.

Does the contribution include files for immediate use in all requested formats?
[35]Yes, all required file formats were included.
[8]Most requested file formats requested by project owner were provided, but not all.
[1]No, submitted files were not ready for immediate use and require editing or adjustments.
[0]No files were provided.

Technical quality of graphics was:
[11]Excellent, no mistakes within the design.
[24]Very good with minor mistakes that are visible in the provided files.
[6]Good but the design has some more serious flaws that need to be corrected.
[3]Bad. The design does not follow graphics standard and is barely usable.

How would you describe the formatting, language and overall presentation of the post?
[7]The post is of very high quality.
[28]The post is of decent quality, but not spectacular in any way.
[6]The post is poorly written and/or formatted, but readable.
[3]The post is really hard to read and the content is barely understandable

How would you rate the overall value of this contribution on the open source community and ecosystem?
[1]This contribution brings great and impactful value, and can be used for applications outside the specific project.
[4]This contribution adds significant value to the open source community and ecosystem, or is of critical importance to the specific project.
[35]This contribution adds some value to the open source community and ecosystem or is only valuable to the specific project.
[4]This contribution adds nearly no value to the open source community and ecosystem or the specific project.