Comparative Study of Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake Consensus Models on Token Distribution Fairness

Consensus model is one of the most significant factors in the world of cryptocurrency, as there are particular ways that coins are introduced and distributed. The two most used models are Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS). Blockchain networks are managed by these systems and it is determined by them how the transactions can be validated and how new tokens are distributed between participants.

Since I am a Nigerian and have closely been observing the progress of blockchain, I am interested in knowing how these two systems are different, in particular, with regard to fairness in the distribution of tokens.

The first method that was introduced by Bitcoin was Proof-of-Work. It is similar to a competition where miners apply strong computers to solve mathematical problems. The individual who cracks the case is rewarded the first - new tokens. Although this model is safe and tested, there is a huge disadvantage to this. Those miners that have the most powerful machines or big mining farms stand better chances of winning rewards.

Image Source

This implies that individuals who possess less money or weaker computers as is the case with many members of developing nations like Nigeria have little or no opportunity to compete. Thus, spreading tokens in PoW tends to give more advantage to the wealthy ones, and in the long run, it is less equitable.

Conversely, Proof-of-Stake is a model that is more recent and attempts to address this issue. PoS does not need computer power but people can receive rewards depending on the number of tokens they have and the amount of tokens they are staking in the network. This implies that any user possessing some tokens will be able to be involved in authenticating transactions and will be rewarded.

I am personally of the opinion that PoS is more just since it allows more individuals to enter the system without the need to purchase costly machines. Nevertheless, it is not without its issues as well as those who already possess significant quantities of tokens will continue to receive rewards, and this will lead to inequality in the long run.

To summarize, there are pros and cons associated with Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake as far as the equitable distribution of tokens is concerned. PoW provides chances because of the computing capacity whereas PoS rewards individuals with higher token amounts.

In my opinion, the only fair system is the one which integrates the best of the two, which is to mitigate the disparity between the rich and the poor as well as provide everyone an equal opportunity to engage. With the current expansion of blockchain in the global society, and particularly in Nigeria, equity in token allocation must not be among the least priorities in the crypto community.