FDA document lists autism as an adverse effect of "tripedia" vaccine

in tripedia •  3 years ago 

An interesting document was posted to the official FDA website, only to be removed afterwards. Luckily a few archive services caught it.

The document was originally hosted at - https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM101580.pdf

It was archived at - https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170112211659/http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM101580.pdf

I've copied it as well, and mirrored it here just in case - https://www.steemleak.com/tripedialb.pdf

What is it ?

This document is a pdf of the standard insert packaged with the Whooping cough vaccine called "tripedia". The insert begins with this description:

Tripedia®, Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed (DTaP), for intramuscular use, is a sterile preparation of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids adsorbed, with acellular pertussis vaccine in an isotonic sodium chloride solution containing sodium phosphate to control pH. After shaking, the vaccine is a homogeneous white suspension. Tripedia vaccine is distributed by Sanofi Pasteur Inc .

Why should we care ?

The part that interests me is on page 11

Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include ..(snip).. SIDS .. (snip) .. autism ..(snip).. encephalopathy .

One more time - this document clearly lists :

  • Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (A catch all label for unexplained death)
  • Encepalopathy (Another catch-all for general brain disorder or disease)
  • Autism (!)

As adverse affects of this commercial product pushed for profit onto young children.

I'm glad the product has now been pulled from the market , but the FDA has clearly attempted to hide this document by removing it from the site :

Learn more

If you're still in denial about the adverse health affects of vaccines I suggest you watch the documentary Vaxxed , or read some of the posts from our very own @canadian-coconut .

As a parent of two autistic kids, who were both vaccinated - I'm too angry for words right now.

This isn't the first document that's admitted this , and governments aren't paying out millions of dollars in compensation through secret vaccine court systems for fun.

If you're a non-believer and are planning on commenting about how we're all crazy for saying these things - Save your effort, I'm not going to engage right now.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Thank you for speaking out about this and being brave!

Sadly, not an april fools.

I was going to say that it's hard to take articles seriously today because of the occasion, but man... :(

It's so sad when we realize the depths that people go to just to profit from others. I'm glad to see positive changes being made cause by wider awareness but still.. It shouldn't have happened in the first place. At least they disclosed it though.

I have 2 kids of my own who directly, permanently changed after receiving their vaccines. Don't even start.

My 3 year old son is autistic. I still don't buy it.

No one is saying the only cause for autism is vaccines

  ·  3 years ago (edited)

Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine

This boils down to "someone said it caused autism". To jump on this is spurious.

Yeah, im sure they removed it from the market for something totally unrelated to the huge list of horrible reported results.

  ·  3 years ago (edited)

That list is more than just the parts you highlighted.

It does not follow from 'This product was removed from the market' that 'This product caused those three specific issues'.


Snopes is not a trustworthy source.

Perhaps not, but it cites several other sources.

The fact that the same document is involved with the same methodology from 2005 proves my point.

There are technologies far superior to vaccines available to thinking people. I think that everyone who believes in vaccines should take them, all of them. They can have mine too. The fanaticism it takes to mandate them to everyone is the only concern for me. Militant pro-vaxxers should be jailed before they hurt anyone else from their ignorance. This is a brilliant future we're living in, trying to convince anyone that a failed archaic pretense at technology is anything but dangerous is unethical at best.

I can't take anything on snopes seriously, especially from Kim. Not going to argue about this, believe what you want.

Thank you for spreading awareness!