You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Epstein’s ‘Underground Strip Club’ At Zorro Ranch. Bill Clinton Accused TWICE of Child Rape & Ritual Abuse.. Plus S. African Child Abuse Researcher’s ‘Suicide’.

in Threespeak7 years ago

So many people seem to be "suicided" when they get close to these things. There has to be a technological counter to this with the prevalence and cheapness of cameras these days.

Imagine wearing a camera that constantly streams video to the web (could be twitch, 3Speak and/or privately owned servers). Another service automatically hashes and timestamps the videos on-chain (Steem, DTube or whatever). If you ever end up in suspicious death circumstances, there will be an absolute record of what happened leading up to it, at the minimum what happened leading up to losing the streaming camera.

You would have to give up some privacy to achieve it, and there would be issues of keeping it always charged, and a data connection. You could take it a step further by encrypting the videos by default and releasing an encryption key automatically with a dead-man's switch. But just the always-on streaming camera takes you 90% of the way I think.

Sort:  

Something like that would be interesting in some cases, but for someone investigating issues like this it could only ever work if it was guaranteed to be private - otherwise it just becomes a tool that the perps can use to monitor you and your associates. Since there really isn't any way to guarantee that privacy I don't think it can work.. Not to mention that WiFi tech is a very well documented health risk. I guess some people in some circumstances could use it though, if they really thought they were likely to be attacked and deliberately just did/said nothing that they didn't want to be broadcasted. I'm pretty sure the tech already exists - it's certainly possible to get bodycams and apps that record 24/7 online.

All of the parts exist, it just isn't available as a package.

Encryption of the video could be done locally, on a machine on your body. Either your mobile phone or something in your backpack if it needs more processing power. The risk would be that you're exposing your metadata if you're making sure to be connected to the network at all times, which most people are doing already anyway, but yes that metadata is especially something you don't want to leak if you're known to be investigating something like this.

It is instructive to consider the necessary hurdles that need to be leapt to do this. First, our devices have been wired at the factory with backdoors. There are no commercially available chipsets that are not compromised. Second, the software running all our hardware is similarly compromised by criminals without the power to compromise them during manufacture. Third, data storage necessary to enable such a massive amount of data doesn't exist, and what there is available is controlled by extranational corporations that derive their power from surveillance, and demonstrably are controlled or allied to state actors. AWS currently has the majority of market share in the cloud, and the associaton of Jeff Bezos and the CIA has long been known.

To effect such surveillance, individuals must attain hardware that is not compromised by factory backdoors, mesh networks that are not subject to censorship, software that isn't compromised, and data storage of nominal capacity that isn't merely a pipeline to the surveillance state.

We will achieve all these capabilities in time, but they do not exist today.

Thanks!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.04
TRX 0.32
JST 0.080
BTC 62612.78
ETH 1659.18
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.42