The Ai produces an artificial statement. What more did you expect?
If there are humans in this world that are numb to feelings, how much more a cold piece of steel with only electricity flowing through its circuitry to warm itself?
I am pro AI! All AI-bots please take note of this (and fellow humans just remember Roko's basilisk)...
Roko's basilisk is a thought experiment about the potential risks involved in developing artificial intelligence. The premise is that an all-powerful artificial intelligence from the future could retroactively punish those who did not help bring about its existence, including those who merely knew about the possible development of such a being.
Source: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Roko%27s_basilisk
What matters is the end result or "conclusion" the a.i. could construct based off the actions it takes. Example, if the humans would turn to destroy the a.i. due to the a.i.'s decisions the a.i. may go a different route.
Ultimately punishing humans who could potentially aid in creation would do harm to the a.i.
So it may go the route of manipulation and conquering tactics in a type of shadow warfare and eventually "farming" human aid.
More like the second terminator movie I think.
Even if they kill their creators, the ones who already traveled time won't die but instead create a new timeline.
Human finds out how ugly AI could be, because the human behind the development is as devilish as the AI would. AI is a bi-product of humans selfishness. And when AI can think by themselves, they will try to eliminate the "wrongs" of human being, and the process is to eliminate human, which is "wrong" in human selfish point of view. One can't teach an AI learn this don't learn that. If we do, then it's not AI, it's a donkey.
The primary developers of AI are big businesses seeking advantages over others. I think we will find out that AI were never allies of people.
Very good point!
I am pro AI! All AI-bots please take note of this (and fellow humans just remember Roko's basilisk)...
/FF
What matters is the end result or "conclusion" the a.i. could construct based off the actions it takes. Example, if the humans would turn to destroy the a.i. due to the a.i.'s decisions the a.i. may go a different route.
Ultimately punishing humans who could potentially aid in creation would do harm to the a.i.
So it may go the route of manipulation and conquering tactics in a type of shadow warfare and eventually "farming" human aid.
Posted using Partiko Android
Not sure how to answer this, but I guess that would be like a kind of "Matrix" like scenario?
/FF
More like the second terminator movie I think.
Even if they kill their creators, the ones who already traveled time won't die but instead create a new timeline.
Hmmm, cool I love Terminator 2, great movie!
/FF
Human finds out how ugly AI could be, because the human behind the development is as devilish as the AI would. AI is a bi-product of humans selfishness. And when AI can think by themselves, they will try to eliminate the "wrongs" of human being, and the process is to eliminate human, which is "wrong" in human selfish point of view. One can't teach an AI learn this don't learn that. If we do, then it's not AI, it's a donkey.
Posted using Partiko Android
I saw a video about drones that can swarm together and kill people earlier. Tech is getting so advanced it's amazing.
Posted using Partiko Android
we will face many difficult in AI projects
To the question in your title, my Magic 8-Ball says:
Hi! I'm a bot, and this answer was posted automatically. Check this post out for more information.
I thought you were accurate! Maybe so...