From the outlet to the outlet or waiting for BATTERIES of the future!?

in #technology7 years ago

From the success of the introduction of new technologies of batteries depends on the further development of many areas, and especially consumer electronics.


sourse

For most, like for me for a long time was the question: Why is technology frozen in place? After all, for many years not any noticeable changes (except for care to the masses so-called powerbank for charging your devices on the go).

It is strange to observe that the large-capacity batteries more can be found from Chinese manufacturers, and the world tops Apple mobile devices and Samsung allegedly did not pay it any attention. Or the whole problem started a few years ago, "the struggle for the size/thickness of the devices" depends on the development of batteries!?

It is worth mentioning that Li-ion batteries created in the 70-ies still occupy a large part of the modern market (and came from Sony in 1991). Later launched and lithium-polymer (Li-Po), the main advantage of which has become a form of media (now and Li-Ion capable, see the battery iPhone).

For more than 25 years there have been various developments, which did not provide a balanced solution "price-quality" for the mass production of and replace known types of batteries.

Alternative battery technology:

  • lithium-sulfur three times the current capacity, but "at odds" with the humidity and low temperature
  • aluminum-ion can be recharged for a couple of minutes with a huge resource of life, but give too low a voltage
  • lithium silicon good everything, except a resource, as become useless at 100 cycles (although after updating, the potential is huge, but expensive)
  • lithium-oxygen affordable and energy-intensive, however, wear quickly and emit a lot of excess heat
  • graphene with the excellent capacity and speed, but so far there's only laboratory samples

The largest producers of consumer electronics mainly focus on a revision of current Li-Ion technologies increasing their opportunities to +20% year-on-year while maintaining/reducing the size of the elements.

Much time is spent on approaches to energy saving: optimization of technological process of manufacture of processors (20 nm > 14 nm), memory (+ transition DDR3 > DDR4) , displays (AMOLED), it should be noted - leads to a significant reduction in the energy consumption. Introducing the charging efficiency, etc QuickCharge (top-end model of the same Samsung charged for 1 hour), widely spread contactless charging.

Special attention is given to technology development of solid electrolyte for the familiar lithium-ion batteries (which potential will give +30% capacity, much longer service life without degradation of elements). And Toyota design on the basis of the crystal of the electrolyte, with similar effectiveness and less cost in case of their implementations.

In the end, we see that technologies that can be modified when you invest a lot, but "rush" to change everything - companies have been slow (they still need to capitalize on current production)!

Sort:  

great post^^, followed u and upvoted some of your posts can u do that to for me pls :)

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by glex from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews/crimsonclad, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.

This post has received a 1.04 % upvote from @drotto thanks to: @banjo.

Hey man very intersting post looking foreward to more

Also Id like to nominate it in a group im in.

This gem of a post was discovered by the OCD Team!

Reply to this comment if you accept, and are willing to let us share your gem of a post! By accepting this, you have a chance to receive extra rewards and one of your photos in this article may be used in our compilation post!

You can follow @ocd – learn more about the project and see other Gems! We strive for transparency.

Of course, happy to share

Tell me, is it possible to mark in the future such articles with the tag "ocd"?

you can but I dont think it will increase your chance to be found by us.
In my opinion Its better to use the relevant tags so people interested in the topic will find it.
you post got featured in issue 49 by the way.

Great writing. It seems like this is the current bottleneck when it comes to our technological development.

Think about the intent of corporations, conspiracy theories )))

True, there is an incentive to keep people tethered in someway, but there is also incentive to develop something better. Its just a matter of time before the true innovators find the solution...I hope.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.32
TRX 0.11
JST 0.034
BTC 66269.58
ETH 3204.67
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.24