Immediately I Start to follow @whack.science example after He is flagged for Self-Voting, Voting for Same People & Writing Same Content All the Time & & after He shows His example of No Self-Voting, No Voting for Same people, No Same people Voting for Him
Today, I declare to put Myself on the Side of Order on Steemit, Actually on the Side of Bloggers that do Flagging.
That would mean that I will be Inspector in front of these humble people, where we will chase after all those Bloggers that Vote for themselves all the time, All those Voting for Same people all the time, All those that are Voted by Same people all the time & All those writing same dull content all the time.
I immediately start not doing those bad things on which are charged & condemned: @slowwalker, @broncnutz, @dobartim, @flysky, @aidasfg7, @jerrybanfield,...and others after I see positive example by @whack.science after He is flagged for doing all those things in the past & proceeding not to that in the future...
Please, forgive me if I forgot Somebody to mention on the list of flagged Bloggers...
So, by educating Bloggers with Flagging, there will be no Blogger that Votes for Itself, No Blogger voting for Same people & No Blogger that will be Voted by Same people & No Blogger writing Same Dull Content all the time.
Why I am sure @whack.science will be flagged ?
Because the nice group of Bloggers doing flagging want to put law in order, so everybody breaking this law should be learn by flagging no to self vote, not to vote for same people, not to be voted by same people & not to write same dull content every day. As @whack.science is doing all those things he will be flagged by the Flagging group....
Of course, Flagging group will flag Him because they are same to Everyone breaking the rules & Of course they are First example of No Self-Voting, No Voting for Same people, Not to be Voted by Same people & Not to write same dull Content all the time...
Of course, the principles will be spread on all others as law is law, right fulfilling of Steemit's policy is right fulfilling of Steemit's policy & the rules are Same for Everybody...
@whack.science has not been flagged yet although he is doing same things we are accused for.
= Votes for Himself,
= Votes for the same Circle of people,
= He is voted by same people and
= He publishes Same dull Content Every day...
How is that possible, #newsteem doesn't work for Him ?
It works only for @slowwalker, @cryptopassion, @broncnutz, @aidasfg7, @dobartim, @flysky...
How is that called ?
ARE YOU AFFRAID OF QUESTIONS? :)
if you ONLY did your research that would be fine. You just want to attack me because I exposed your little group with spammer and socket puppet accounts.
Yes, I vote for myself and it's VERY OFTEN with 50% power and sometimes I don't vote for myself because I don't have % power because I manually curate others, if you know what does that mean.
You say I make dull content? DID YOU CHECK MY CONTENT? What is DULL with it? Please explain me :D
edit: you also said that it's the SAME content. Explain to me how's my content same? Please :D
Posted using Partiko Android
Tako san i mislia... Lako je čmičmit a kad triba nesto reč ka odrasla osoba onda te nema nigdi. Kako ste jadni.
Oh, Dear @whack.science why are You nervous, because I am not answering ? I tried to discuss but here, I feel like I am leading monologue. There is no dialogue but the dialogue is flagging...
However the time will show the results of everyone's act & everyone will saw, what they reap...
Still no answers. Seems like arguments are something alien to you.
If you want to attack, then stay behind your words. But your words are empty so I understand. Liar liar pants on fire.
Do you know how pie charts work?
Can you spot the difference?
Dear @pharesim You flagged me for self - voting and now I declare myself to be Inspector in front of Your group of Bloggers doing flagging to put Steemit in order and I found the first one doing Self-voting. That is @whack.science Intensive Self -Voter.
So, be kind to put law in order in His case & Flag Him for Intensive Self-Voting...
Thanks 🙏🙏🙏 for being Honest in Your Mission...
Nobody is flagged for self voting alone, if it isn't overly excessive. Nobody gets blamed for one self vote a day.
You're downvoted for trading votes in a group. Above chart shows that 80% of your votes go to the same 8 people, who vote you back in return.
I write one post a day and @whack.science writes more often, He is overly excessive self-voter. Where is that once a day self voting is ok ? I do that once a day and I am Flagged...
And of course same people keep voting for him instead of supporting new users and #newsteem...
Maybe You are not flagging Him because He is delegating SP to @ocdb & @curangel...?
Who is not objective here ?
We don't look at incoming votes. Only outgoing, because these are your responsibility.
What's up @flysky? You are not man of your word? :)
What's up @tatjanastan, will you answer my questions? Since you can attack, probably you can answer questions from the person you are attacking? Huh?
if you ONLY did your research that would be fine. You just want to attack me because I exposed your little group with spammer and socket puppet accounts.
Yes, I vote for myself and it's VERY OFTEN with 50% power and sometimes I don't vote for myself because I don't have % power because I manually curate others, if you know what does that mean.
You say I make dull content? DID YOU CHECK MY CONTENT? What is DULL with it? Please explain me :D
edit: you also said that it's the SAME content. Explain to me how's my content same? Please :D
@pharesim I will flagg @whack.science now when you presented me his statistics. Thank you @pharesim for highlighting this voting and selfvoting rules for member to community. I will join you to downvote member @whack.science like this who abused 100 % selfvote rule
lol. That's the stats of tatjanastan, you brainless turtle.
Since we talk about stats. You really talk like small whale.
Vlemon gave good answer to you and your lobby
Here it Is:
“No votes are going to broncnutz and cryptopassion anymore so you can cross this out. I like jrcornel posts so yes I upvote. Then you have my self votes which I think is still okay isn’t it ?
So you have 25% left on 3 people and the rest on other people. 75% of my upvotes away not through autovotes (taking away my own posts) is still not enough?
75% of your upvotes go to 15 people ! What about your split ? And you get Steem from being a witness so you don’t need to upvote yourself.
Do you think it is fair to give 75% of your upvotes and witness rewards to 15 people most of which are your friends or projects such as @curangel ?
“
Why don't you link to it, so people can read my answer directly where the question was asked?
Let me help you with that:
https://steemit.com/dblog/@vlemon/re-pharesim-2019113t131150551z#@pharesim/q0echb
And I will upvote this comment. Dealing with idiots like you needs to be paid.
Because you've shown that you give downwards to anyone who disagrees with you, you and your lobby group are doing a lot worse things than tatjanastan
Only street language person and small whale like @pharesim can talk like this. You try to be important here on steemit at least act like whale.
I'm the small street whale, and you're the brainless turtle. 😂 Someone should make a comic.
I will upvote this comment. Dealing with idiots like you needs to be paid.
Your way of communication shows your character, you are not a person with good communication style and this is not a street but a serious portal.
Piss off old man, nobody gives a shit about your opinion.
ahahahhhhahahaahahahahahahahahah now he will flag her, if he is a man of his word aaahahahaaaha
Let's see :)
Congratulations @tatjanastan! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPDo not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
😀😀😀
Can you translate into proper English so people get your message? You won't flag @jerrybanfield says a lot about yourself lol!
??? I don't understand what You want to say ?
I am not Flagging anyone...
Passt schon, alles gut - wir reden morgen ok?
It is true that you are part of the same lobby group that usurps Steem and censors it.
?? which lobby group? What did I downvote (yet)?
What does this mean?
xD u r funny. Tell me where your Ego hurts? :)))
čmi čmiii