Beyond climate change / global warming. What's behind?

Hello dear friends,

I hope those who decide to participate in this interesting contest are very successful, and in that regard, I thank and congratulate @upmewhale for promoting them.

I agree with the statement about the highly controversial and interesting topic: Climate Change / Global Warming, and which now makes headlines on the world agenda.

We have been listening for decades, that man has been destroying the natural environment to meet the needs and desires of the growing population of today's civilization. Even the most foolish, have called the human species parasitic and harmful to the planet, as if they belonged to another humanity and therefore, free of guilt. This is a worrying attitude, if we consider that it can transcend simple rhetoric and become a real threat.

Initially I considered arguing the topic post answering each of the questions suggested in the call:

What is climate change?

It is a natural and cyclic process of the planet that self-regulates, including, the anthropic effects.

What does it mean to you? How does it affect you and your community?

A reality that determines my environment, where I am, one more element of the current process, obviously, affects us all, as part of the system.

To what extent is an instrument of certain political agendas?

I believe that more than an instrument in the hands of the power blocs, it is the main engine of its political agenda to establish world government.

How can we manage / solve it? Share your ideas

In this particular case, I would replant the question. Is it possible to manage or resolve climate change? The answer involves the individual action shared by all mankind. There is a very special consideration, who will be smart enough to determine the type of action.

What theories and data do you believe and which do not? Why?

This is a question that implies the belief in theories, that is to say in speculations. So I could reserve the answer until the end of the post.

What are the main technologies and countries responsible for it?

We have been taught or instilled in recent decades that the emission of high concentrations of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by industrial activity in developed countries is responsible for the phenomenon, this is the product of a civilization based on petroleum technologies.

Then I thought, why not digress a little more?

With the information received in recent years, anyone would dare to establish that global warming generated by human activity is the cause of current climate change, but is this totally true?

I do not doubt that it affects something, but I have reasonable doubts about it. Let us briefly consider the destructive phenomenon of the massive fire in Australia that tested the human capacity to counteract it. He could not, only the appearance of storms and rains extinguished the flames, now, the danger is in the floods. Two extreme situations for the same region, one after the other.

Can we blame man for the extreme changes in the current climate?

The answer will depend on who speculates or on the theory that best fits their beliefs. Speaking of beliefs, today it is dismissed, to whom he bases his answer on the sacred writings of his religion. For a biblical exegete, climate change is caused by the evil of man. What you think? Will it have more or less validity regarding a scientific theory? The modern debate between science and religion.

In his Critias dialogue, Platon states that a fabulous and highly developed society was destroyed in a day and a night for abusing science. At least, that is what my mind registers after reading the dialogue and many series of theories that revolve around it in the search for lost civilization.

The common factor in both stories, the action of man, led to destruction. In both stories a serious change in the climate is suggested. in the first of global reach and in the second of local type, although it refers to an entire continent. So anthropic changes are not new at all.

Who does not know the origin of Superman, the last survivor of a planet with a highly advanced civilization that over exploited natural resources, destroyed the planet, Krypton. We could say that in the field of modern fiction, writers warned of the terrible consequences of the abuse of nature.

In our days, the United Nations 2030 agenda is under development based on the encyclical of Pope Francis, Laudato Si. Likewise, we see environmental activists such as teenager Greta Thunberg who apparently advocate dismantling or mitigating the current industrial production system to avoid climate change. Hundreds of videos and information fill the internet, some in favor and others against. A great confusion is reigning, but who is behind all of them?

My opinion on this matter, like yours, will be simple, most likely influenced by the elite's communication strategies. Among those who think that climate change is the responsibility of man and those who think it is not. I believe that both sides are right about something, but they are also wrong. Where are they right? In the action of man, if he has contributed to the current natural cycle of climate change, but they are wrong to think, he is able to change it. There are still forces that we ignore, that escape our understanding, and although if we knew them, they are still beyond our ability to manipulate it for beneficial purposes.

For me, climate change is the latest innovation for the social control of a more interdependent world. This brings to my mind Georgia Guidestones in the United States of America, a decalogue, made in eight languages, environmentalist of the late 70s of the last century that advocates the reduction to less than 500 million people so that the planet is sustainable. How crazy the world has, they don't believe! Thanos click is a child's play in the minds of these people. I just hope they are unable to fulfill such a macabre plan.