You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Scrutinizing a dark top model with colliders, cosmology and astrophysics
What? No! At least I think (not sure to have fully understood your comment),
We have a model that features that constant and that agrees very well with data. This is currently the best model relatively to data, which is why it is commonly coined as 'standard' cosmology,
On the other hand, alternatives exist, some people are working on them, because we must stay open minded.
However, data today can not point to one or the other options. Which is why it is worthy to explore all options.
Yes, I can understand that. Is not the cosmology investigation involves uncovering the form through modeling, which is then tested. The testing process will determine the model closest to the truth. In a realist interpretation, if it is assumed that complete truth about the Universe can be attained, it is a perfect correspondence between the statements in ideal theory and the structure of the Universe in the independence of its existence. Neither the standards nor the relativity of our cosmology have their respective beliefs which are more apt to be opted in.