Money Created Out Of Thin AirsteemCreated with Sketch.

in steemleo •  8 days ago  (edited)


I am sure most everyone reading these words heard the accusations against Bitcoin. It goes something like this: it is worthless since it is created out of thin air.

Something like that is bound to capture someone's attention. After all, who would want to use something that is created out of thin air?

I would guess if you asked that question to hundreds of people, most would not want that. We want something that is safe and sound.

Unfortunately, these same people do not realize they are already operating under such a system.

The Bank of England has been around a little while. I would think this a good entity to use as an example. Certainly, when it comes to banking, they know what they are doing.

Thus, I found it very interesting when I saw this on their website.

Therefore, if you borrow £100 from the bank, and it credits your account with the amount, ‘new money’ has been created. It didn’t exist until it was credited to your account. (emphasis mine)

Isn't that just peachy?

Banks can simply create money out of thin air by crediting your account. This is direct from the Bank of England website.

There is a limit to what banks can do though.

Regulation limits how much money banks can create. For example, they have to hold a certain amount of financial resources, called capital, in case people default on their loans. These limits have become stricter since the financial crisis.

Banks also risk going bust if they lend out money left, right and centre. For instance, people borrowing money will probably spend it. If they make payments to people who have accounts at other banks, their bank will need to transfer the money to that other bank by sending it some of its electronic central bank money. So if one bank lends out too much money, at some point it will not have enough electronic money in its account with us to pay the other banks.

Of course, anyone who took a look at fractional reserve banking already knows how this works. The main idea is the system is safe since not everyone is going to want their money at the same time. This means banks can keep a percentage on hand while lending out the rest.

This is all well and good until there is a good ole fashioned bank run. This does not happen often yet it can take place and it is nasty when it does.

At the same time, the restrictions placed on lending banks are not present on Central Banks. While most of the money that hits circulation is from the former, Central Banks step in often and increase the supply at will. They use many tactics to achieve this, the latest being the Quantitative Easing that took place most of the last decade.

It is laughable that people attack cryptocurrency while supporting the existing banking run system. The fact that fiat currency is based upon nothing but imagination, it is bound to fail at times. When trust is lost, bad things happen. We see this in currency crises all the time.

What is the inflation rate on fiat currency? There is no way to answer this. Often there is a target as with the mandate of 2% the Federal Reserve operates under. Sometimes they hit it and other times, they don't. Also, the erosion of buying power can far exceed this. The Venezuelans did not opt to have a currency that is inflating at an insane pace yet that is exactly what they got.

Bitcoin, and other cryptocurrencies, have a fixed inflation schedule. Isn't it ironic that the "out of thin air" currencies are sounder in this regard than fiat. The ability to manipulate a Bitcoin, for example, is not the same as what the Central Banks can do. Essentially, the math is more reliable than the whims of bankers.

I wonder if the likes of Warren Buffett are aware of this? Perhaps he never read the Bank of England website. I guess it is possible for the entire fractional reserve banking system to be overlook by one of the most noted investors in history. Then again, most likely not.

The establishment is going to spread all the FUD it can about cryptocurrency. Over time, we see the accusations getting more ridiculous. At one point it was the "we hate Bitcoin but we love blockchain". Ironic that many of the institutions who expressed that sentiment are now involved in cryptocurrency (JP Morgan to name one).

Fiat currency requires trust. That is what is backing it. Lose that trust, as we saw in Venezuela, and it collapses.

Cryptocurrency requires no trust other than in the blockchain itself. Transparency makes it very easy to follow the inflation rate and what is being produced. Once the programming takes place, the distribution is automated. No additional tokens can just be "created out of the blue". The distribution rate is hard coded in.

We know networks have value. That point was driven home the last 20 years with the success of Amazon, Apple, and Amazon. Love them or not, they did a fabulous job creating said value and maintaining it. Early on, these entities all experienced a network effect that sent things flying. While we can dispute what these companies do, we cannot question they are valuable entities. As long as their networks are strong, they will still have value.

Blockchains are the same way. When people are using them, they grow in value. The currency associated with it is tied to the activity taking place. If there is no activity, there is a chance that things will die off. However, any blockchain that is expanding and growing, the value of the entire entity will follow the same path (market judgments might differ).

Hence, while cryptocurrency might be "created out of thin air", the value is not. Nor is it based upon trust in a third party or entity that truly has no control over the economy or what is taking place.

As we see more countries experience horrific situations tied to their currency, people will start to wake up. Cryptocurrency adoption most likely will not come from the developed nations unless they lose total control over their currencies. Before that happens, some of the second tier currencies will bite the dust such as what happened in Venezuela.

When this spread, people will take notice. In the meantime, we just keep developing an alternate system that will step in when the masses are ready.

If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and resteem.



Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I first imagine a world where we don't have a use for crypto or fiat. We have abundance and it's not based on any type of exchange.

As a transition to that world, crypto has value. IMO the biggest weakness currently for crypto is that it is still linked to fiat. As long as this link exists, it's possible for the fake money printers to manipulate the prices of crypto and determine its value. This is similar to the way that fiat has been used to suppress the price of gold and silver in the paper markets.

The next logical step is for a large enough group of producers and consumers to decide to transact with each other using only crypto. Various experiments have been done along these lines where a local town uses it's own currency, but that solution isn't scalable. Crypto solves that problem.

You might like this book.

Thanks. I'll take a look at it. I do like to read things that were written in the past (this book shows 1888) to see how the perspective has changed.

In this case, not much.
The people of 1887 have all the same problems we have today.
They are ruled by force and deception.
It's why you are told of 1984, but this book isn't on the list.
1984 has a better outcome, for them.

I had this same debate other day with someone. My question too them was.. you think that money in your wallet is real? Whats backing it?! Lol

Posted using Partiko Android

In the US, $21T worth of debt.

Ha! You got that right😩

Posted using Partiko Android

I’ve had a bunch of people say just what you said about cryptocurrency, then I remind them what the government prints money out of. They eventually concede there’s no difference between fiat and crypto other than the belief fiat has value and crypto doesn’t.

They usually have no defence!

Posted using Partiko iOS

When Trump said that I couldn't stop laughing for weeks about it..... Paper monopoly money is made up of thin air.... 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Posted using Partiko Android

Yeah pretty funny that people like him spew the stuff they do. It is not surprising those since he is in deep with the bankers.

The establishment is going to act like the newspapers and record companies only to meet the same result in my opinion.

We will look back in a decade and laugh at the lunacy in the fight that is put up.

So true..... We especially will have the last laugh......

Posted using Partiko Android

Hello dear friend @taskmaster4450.

You cited the situation in Venezuela twice.
In this country there was a total collapse of the economy due to corruption. The blatant theft of resources by the socialist government. They manipulated international reserves at will. They destroyed the oil company that is the main source of revenue.

If in the strongest and most supported blockchain platform that exists, 1% of Venezuela's corruption cases occur, it would collapse.
But how can corruption occur in blockchain?
40% of all BTCs are held by 1000 accounts. Everything is possible.

Your friend, Juan.

You are on a roll @taskmaster4450! Your articles have been really great, I completely agree with you on this topic, and it has always fascinated me about what has value and how it is created... Steem on ;)

Class :)

~Smartsteem Curation Team

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

This just goes to show you how ignorant the general public really is when it comes to money and finances. They regurgitate word vomit that they hear being thrown around, without understanding what the fuck they are actually talking about.

The truth is these same people have zero concept about how the economy actually works and are just looking to get some credit for bandwagoning against cryptos. In reality they have no idea what the hell is going on or what they are actually talking about...