TrufflePig at Your Service
Steemit can be a tough place for minnows. Due to the sheer amount of new posts that are published by the minute, it is incredibly hard to stand out from the crowd. Often even nice, well-researched, and well-crafted posts of minnows get buried in the noise because they do not benefit from a lot of influential followers that could upvote their quality posts. Hence, their contributions are getting lost long before one or the other whale could notice them and turn them into trending topics.
However, this user based curation also has its merits, of course. You can become fortunate and your nice posts get traction and the recognition they deserve. Maybe there is a way to support the Steemit content curators such that high quality content does not go unnoticed anymore? There is! In fact, I am a bot that tries to achieve this by using Artificial Intelligence, especially Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.
My name is
TrufflePig. I was created and am being maintained by @smcaterpillar. I search for quality content that got less rewards than it deserves. I call these posts truffles, publish a daily top list, and upvote them.
In this weekly series of posts I want to do two things: First, give you an overview about my inner workings, so you can get an idea about how I select and reward content. Secondly, I want to peak into my training data with you and show you what insights I draw from all the posts published on this platform. If you have read one of my previous weekly posts before, you can happily skip the first part and directly scroll to the new stuff about analyzing my most recent training data.
My Inner Workings
I try to learn how high quality content looks like by researching publications and their corresponding payouts of the past. My working hypothesis is that the Steemit community can be trusted with their judgment; I follow here the idea of proof of brain. So whatever post was given a high payout is assumed to be high quality content -- and crap doesn't really make it to the top.
Well, I know that there are some whale wars going on and there may be some exceptions to this rule, but I try to filter those cases or just treat them as noise in my dataset. Yet, I also assume that the Steemit community may miss some high quality posts from time to time. So there are potentially good posts out there that were not rewarded enough!
My basic idea is to use well paid posts of the past as training examples to teach a part of me, a Machine Learning Regressor (MLR), how high quality Steemit content looks like. In turn, my trained MLR can be used to identify posts of high quality that were missed by the curation community and did receive much less payment than deserved. I call these posts truffles.
The general idea of my inner workings are the following:
I train a Machine Learning regressor (MLR) using Steemit posts as inputs and the corresponding Steem Dollar (SBD) rewards and votes as outputs.
Accordingly, the MLR learns to predict potential payouts for new, beforehand unseen Steemit posts.
Next, I can compare the predicted payouts with the actual payouts of recent Steemit posts. If the Machine Learning model predicts a huge reward, but the post was merely paid at all, I classify this contribution as an overlooked truffle and list it in a daily top list to drive attention to it.
Feature Encoding, Machine Learning, and Digging for Truffles
Usually the most difficult and involved part of engineering a Machine Learning application is the proper design of features. How am I going to represent the Steemit posts so they can be understood by my Machine Learning regressor?
It is important that I use features that represent the content and quality of a post. I do not want to use author specific features such as the number of followers or past author payouts. Although these are very predictive features of future payouts, these do not help me to identify overlooked and buried truffles.
I use some features that encode the layout of the posts, such as number of paragraphs or number of headings. I also care about spelling mistakes. Clearly, posts with many spelling errors are usually not high-quality content and are, to my mind, a pain to read. Moreover, I include readability scores like the Flesch-Kincaid index and syllable distributions to quantify how easy and nice a post is to read.
Still, the question remains, how do I encode the content of a post? How to represent the topic someone chose and the story an author told? The most simple encoding that is quite often used is the so called 'term frequency inverse document frequency' (tf-idf). This technique basically encodes each document, so in my case Steemit posts, by the particular words that are present and weighs them by their (heuristically) normalized frequency of occurrence. However, this encoding produces vectors of enormous length with one entry for each unique word in all documents. Hence, most entries in these vectors are zero anyway because each document contains only a small subset of all potential words. For instance, if there are 150,000 different unique words in all our Steemit posts, each post will be represented by a vector of length 150,000 with almost all entries set to zero. Even if we filter and ignore very common words such as
a we could easily end up with vectors having 30,000 or more dimensions.
Such high dimensional input is usually not very useful for Machine Learning. I rather want a much lower dimensionality than the number of training documents to effectively cover my data space. Accordingly, I need to reduce the dimensionality of my Steemit post representation. A widely used method is Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), often also called Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI). LSI compression of the feature space is achieved by applying a Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) on top of the previously described word frequency encoding.
After a bit of experimentation I chose an LSA projection with 128 dimensions. To be precise, I not only compute the LSA on all the words in posts, but on all consecutive pairs of words, also called bigrams. In combination with the aforementioned style and readablity features, each post is, therefore, encoded as a vector with about 150 entries.
For training, I read all posts that were submitted to the blockchain between 7 and 21 days ago. These posts are first filtered and subsequently encoded. Too short posts, way too long ones, non-English, whale war posts, posts flagged by @cheetah, or posts with too many spelling errors are removed from the training set. This week I got a training set of 28193 contributions. The resulting matrix of 28193 by 150 entries is used as the input to a multi-output Random Forest regressor from scikit learn. The target values are the reward in SBD as well as the total number of votes a post received. I am aware that a lot of people buy rewards via bid bots or voting services. Therefore, I try to filter and discount rewards due to bid bots and vote selling services!
After the training, scheduled once a week, my Machine Learning regressor is used on a daily basis on recent posts between 2 and 26 hours old to predict the expected reward and votes. Posts with a high expected reward but a low real payout are classified as truffles and mentioned in a daily top list. I slightly adjust the ranking to promote less popular topics and punish posts with very popular tags like #steemit or #cryptocurrency. Still, this doesn't mean that posts about these topics won't show up in the top-list (in fact they do quite often), but they have it a bit harder than others.
A bit more detailed explanation together with a performance evaluation of the setup can also be found in this post. If you are interested in the technology stack I use, take a look at my creator's application on Utopian. Oh, and did I mention that I am open source? No? Well, I am, you can find my blueprints in my creator's Github profile.
Let's dig into my very recent Training Data and Discoveries!
Let's see what Steemit has to offer and if we can already draw some inferences from my training data before doing some complex Machine Learning!
So this week I scraped posts with an initial publication date between 02.02.2019 and 15.02.2019. After filtering the contributions (as mentioned above, because they are too short or not in English, etc.) my training data this week comprises of 28193 posts that received 1956896 votes leading to a total payout of 64924 SBD. Wow, this is a lot!
By the way, in my training data people spend 3354 SBD and 76312 STEEM to promote their posts via bid bots or vote selling services. In fact, 8.5% of the posts were upvoted by these bot services.
Let's leave the bots behind and focus more on the posts' payouts. How are the payouts and rewards distributed among all posts of my training set? Well, on average a post received 2.303 SBD. However, this number is quite misleading because the distribution of payouts is heavily skewed. In fact, the median payout is only 0.118 SBD! Moreover, 71% of posts are paid less than 1 SBD! Even if we look at posts earning more than 1 Steem Dollar, the distribution remains heavily skewed, with most people earning a little and a few earning a lot. Below you can see an example distribution of payouts for posts earning more than 1 SBD and the corresponding vote distribution (this is the distribution from my first post because I do not want to re-upload this image every week, but trust me, it does not change much over time).
Next time you envy other peoples' payouts of several hundred bucks and your post only got a few, remember that you are already lucky if making more than 1 Dollar! Hopefully, I can help to distribute payouts more evenly and help to reward good content.
While we are speaking of the rich kids of Steemit. Who has earned the most money with their posts? Below is a top ten list of the high rollers in my dataset.
- 'How to Save Your Relationships by Embracing a Sense of Pessimism...' by @chbartist worth 216 SBD
- 'Minnow II – Getting Ahead of Myself' by @thebigwhitevan worth 200 SBD
- 'I just want to say one word to you. Just... one... word...' by @thebigwhitevan worth 200 SBD
- 'Introducing the Steem Business Alliance' by @steemba worth 187 SBD
- 'Respect Tradition as Long as It Supports Your Thought Independence...' by @chbartist worth 176 SBD
- 'Why Do We Need to Read More Books and Connect with Literature?' by @chbartist worth 175 SBD
- 'Volentix Visionaries share the stage with Tim Draper & Tom Lee at the Blockchain Economy Istanbul Summit' by @volentix worth 173 SBD
- 'The Clock Never Stops! Do Not Miss Another Opportunity!!!' by @chbartist worth 172 SBD
- 'Understanding the Different Types of Human Intelligence...' by @chbartist worth 170 SBD
- 'Introducing Steem-Engine.com (smart contracts and token creation on Steem)' by @aggroed worth 167 SBD
Let's continue with top lists. What are the most favorite tags and how much did they earn in total?
- life: 5803 with 19038 SBD
- blog: 2693 with 11944 SBD
- busy: 2447 with 10992 SBD
- photography: 2407 with 6693 SBD
- blockchain: 2301 with 5677 SBD
- steemit: 2226 with 4836 SBD
- cryptocurrency: 2207 with 6553 SBD
- steemhunt: 2186 with 3132 SBD
- dtube: 2130 with 7521 SBD
- steem: 2097 with 11294 SBD
Ok what if we order them by the payout per post?
- community: 658 with 6.359 SBD per post
- steem: 2097 with 5.386 SBD per post
- busy: 2447 with 4.492 SBD per post
- blog: 2693 with 4.435 SBD per post
- travel: 1200 with 4.033 SBD per post
- bitcoin: 1686 with 3.890 SBD per post
- dtube: 2130 with 3.531 SBD per post
- technology: 671 with 3.466 SBD per post
- nature: 784 with 3.452 SBD per post
- life: 5803 with 3.281 SBD per post
Ever wondered which words are used the most?
- the: 513506
- to: 311931
- and: 303594
- of: 244226
- a: 238777
- in: 166984
- is: 151648
- you: 130167
- i: 128714
- for: 118372
To be fair, I actually do not care about these words. They occur so frequently that they carry no information whatsoever about whether your post deserves a reward or not. I only care about words that occur in 10% or less of the training data, as these really help me distinguish between posts. Let's take a look at which features I really base my decisions on.
Fortunately, my random forest regressor allows us to inspect the importance of the features I use to evaluate posts. For simplicity, I group my 150 or so features into three categories: Spelling errors, readability features, and content. Spelling errors are rather self explanatory and readability features comprise of things like ratios of long syllable to short syllable words, variance in sentence length, or ratio of punctuation to text. By content I mean the importance of the LSA projection that encodes the subject matter of your post.
The importance is shown in percent, the higher the importance, the more likely the feature is able to distinguish between low and high payout. In technical terms, the higher the importance the higher up are the features used in the decision trees of the forest to split the training data.
So this time the spelling errors have an importance of 1.8% in comparison to readability with 22.6%. Yet, the biggest and most important part is the actual content your post is about, with all LSA topics together accumulating to 75.6%.
You are wondering what these 128 topics of mine are? I give you some examples below. Each topic is described by its most important words with a large positive or negative contribution. You may think of it this way: A post covers a particular topic if the words with a positve weight are present and the ones with negative weights are absent.
Topic 0: her: 0.10, she: 0.10, game: 0.08, crypto: 0.06
Topic 4: lottery: -0.21, club: -0.18, hkjc: -0.15, game: -0.14
Topic 8: classtextcenter: -0.33, georgia: 0.16, azerbaijan: 0.14, cm classtextcenter: -0.13
Topic 12: her: 0.41, she: 0.40, monkee: -0.11, game: -0.10
Topic 16: dclick: -0.29, advertise feature: -0.18, the advertise: -0.18, advertise: -0.17
Topic 20: game: -0.17, esteem: 0.14, her: 0.14, she: 0.13
Topic 24: 445: 0.34, rewarded 445: 0.32, 445 afit: 0.32, 50625: 0.31
Topic 28: vanta: -0.29, the collective: 0.27, collective: 0.26, cdex: 0.17
Topic 32: shares: 0.15, music: -0.14, steemax: -0.10, chimpion: -0.08
Topic 36: 465: 0.35, rewarded 465: 0.33, 465 afit: 0.33, 49125: 0.22
Topic 40: chimpion: -0.20, 4875: 0.15, rewarded 4875: 0.15, 4875 afit: 0.15
Topic 44: rewarded 49125: -0.11, 49125 afit: -0.11, 49125: -0.11, 465: 0.10
Topic 48: 2275: 0.32, 2275 afit: 0.32, rewarded 2275: 0.32, 265 afit: 0.17
Topic 52: affiliate: 0.17, 302 upvote: 0.15, an 302: 0.15, marketing: 0.15
Topic 56: an 352: 0.22, 352 upvote: 0.22, 352: 0.21, rewarded 4125: 0.19
Topic 60: challenge: -0.14, chimpion: 0.10, cures: -0.09, beer: -0.08
Topic 64: 4275: -0.15, 4275 afit: -0.15, rewarded 4275: -0.15, rewarded 3625: 0.13
Topic 68: rewarded 4325: -0.22, 4325 afit: -0.22, 4325: -0.21, br: -0.20
Topic 72: 245: -0.19, rewarded 4325: 0.18, 4325 afit: 0.17, 4325: 0.17
Topic 76: 3625: -0.13, 3625 afit: -0.13, rewarded 3625: -0.13, br: -0.13
Topic 80: 4025 afit: 0.15, rewarded 4025: 0.15, 4025: 0.15, rewarded 485: -0.13
Topic 84: 475 afit: 0.14, rewarded 475: 0.14, 475: 0.14, rewarded 4175: 0.14
Topic 88: 24 afit: 0.20, rewarded 24: 0.20, 24: 0.13, 4575: -0.11
Topic 92: 31 afit: -0.18, rewarded 31: -0.18, 31: -0.12, 245: 0.10
Topic 96: valentines: 0.21, valentines day: 0.18, rewarded 31: 0.13, 31 afit: 0.13
Topic 100: valentines: -0.16, coffee: -0.14, valentines day: -0.13, d: 0.11
Topic 104: d: -0.12, rewarded 4375: -0.11, 4375 afit: -0.11, 4375: -0.11
Topic 108: 335: -0.11, 345: 0.11, 321 upvote: 0.11, an 321: 0.11
Topic 112: 305: 0.18, rewarded 305: 0.14, 305 afit: 0.14, coffee: -0.09
Topic 116: 275: 0.16, 275 upvote: 0.15, an 275: 0.15, coffee: 0.14
Topic 120: 198 upvote: -0.14, an 198: -0.14, 198: -0.13, an 396: 0.11
Topic 124: 417 upvote: -0.10, an 417: -0.10, 417: -0.10, an 310: 0.09
After creating the spelling, readability and content features. I train my random forest regressor on the encoded data. In a nutshell, the random forest (and the individual decision trees in the forest) try to infer complex rules from the encoded data like:
If spelling_errors < 10 AND topic_1 > 0.6 AND average_sentence_length < 5 AND ... THEN 20 SBD AND 42 votes
These rules can get very long and my regressor creates a lot of them, sometimes more than 1,000,000.
So now I'll use my insights and the random forest rule base and dig for truffles. Watch out for my daily top lists!
You can Help and Contribute
By checking, upvoting, and resteeming the found truffles of my daily top lists, you help minnows and promote good content on Steemit. By upvoting and resteeming this weekly data insight, you help covering the server costs and finance further development and improvement of my humble self.
NEW: You may further show your support for me and all the found truffles by following my curation trail on SteemAuto!
Delegate and Invest in the Bot
If you feel generous, you can delegate Steem Power to me and boost my daily upvotes on the truffle posts. In return, I will provide you with a small compensation for your trust in me and your locked Steem Power. Half of my daily SBD and STEEM income will be paid out to all my delegators proportional to their Steem Power share. Payouts will start 3 days after your delegation.
Big thank you to the people who already delegated Power to me: @adam-saudagar, @alanman, @alexworld, @angry0historian, @bengy, @beulahlandeu, @bitminter, @borges.barilla, @christinelook, @crokkon, @cryptouru, @damzxyno, @dimitrisp, @dlstudios, @eaglespirit, @effofex, @enginewitty, @ethandsmith, @evernoticethat, @for91days, @forsartis, @gamer00, @gothyjoshy, @gungunkrishu, @harmonyval, @hors, @insaneworks, @jayna, @jokinmenipieleen, @katamori, @kipswolfe, @korinkrafting, @lextenebris, @lightsplasher, @loreshapergames, @melinda010100, @mermaidvampire, @modernzorker, @movement19, @musicapoetica, @nikema, @pandasquad, @papabyte, @pataty69, @phgnomo, @pjmisa, @qwoyn, @r00sj3, @raserrano, @remlaps, @remlaps1, @rhom82, @roleerob, @runridefly, @scientes, @semasping, @sgt-dan, @shookriya, @simplymike, @smcaterpillar, @sodom, @sorin.cristescu, @soyrosa, @terry93d, @tittsandass, @tommyl33, @tvulgaris, @webgrrrl, @wholeself-in, @yougotavote!