How to get started in the community with Quality or quantity of content?

miguelang357 (59)in #steemit • 6 years ago

Since I started in this community, I focused a lot on the users who had an audience, a theme, good or bad content, money they had. So my doubts were on the rise. It came as not so new users were lucky, as users with time in the community did not have it, I also saw how they had time and at the same time luck. But this truth should not be a matter of luck, considering that the quality of the content should be valued, and it really is. Just what, poor quality content is valued, along with good quality content, poor quality content can have much more money than a well-structured, well-developed content and it is that moment in which it seems that what we call luck enters And the truth is. We will never know how much we would get for publication on the platform, however there are those who manage to maintain a good balance by approaching a similar value in each publication, others like me are really unstable considering that being a new user is not easy. We do not get out of that painful $ 0.01, even though sometimes we get flashes of light and we manage to reach good amounts like $ 2 and up, they are not bad, they are NOT VERY GOOD, but they serve as motivation to hard work, when not we managed to think of other users and we say, incredible oww if I could get that amount of money per publication I would dedicate myself to make content daily hours, but we see that those who do not do it, only publish what is necessary.

It's when we really fill ourselves with doubts.

How much should we publish daily, is quality or quantity the key to get good money?

A user already established in the community is based on making quality content for his audience, is helped by his audience and has a respectable delegated power that is one of the most influential factors in publications in the case of those who have a very strong reputation. good, everyone wants to be a curator of these users, they know that their income is very good or they assume that they are, seeing a good reputation, that hides the quality of the publication, is a little unfair, but at the same time just for the time you are people dedicated to the community in its beginnings, even so it is not always this way and many times users like me! we managed to obscure the quality of these. And we are not valued, of course it is a mistake to believe that we deserve, but it is obvious. Many times we see good accounts only by publishing photos and have a better outcome than you and me, while we write hours and hours, this is the reward for dedication, the respect of the community reflected in votes.

A new user in steemit, a user below the year in the community, tries to look as close as possible to a stable account, showing the quality. But the cruel reality is that the quality seen is only that of the large users, and it is when those who are inexperienced go into despair and fill themselves with doubts, even with 500 followers and others with fewer followers get better votes. It is when they opt for the amount of content, publish many times a day looking for at least $ 1 among all the minimum publications. We become full spamers, people who do not give good content, but if a good quantity is obtained, when we provide the quality we do not get it, and it is when the new users fill with doubts, however. It is always good to start both ways, as long as you show constancy and interest, for my part I hope to be both.

Showing quality and quantity, for my audience that will grow with the passing of days, then I will try to provide an entertaining content that is specific and timely. The beginning is difficult, but not impossible, it is when we meet the steemians with our tastes and we study with the passing of the days in the community, in which we perform better as users of this platform.

I would like to hear your opinion about this debate that I have opened. Would you choose which one? Quality is precision, it is just giving where we want to hit the target with our publications and the quantity, it is simply. Question of bets, nothing more and nothing less than luck.