Emergent Budgeting vs. Budget-Setting
Everybody produces STEEM's budget on the fly, primarily through authoring and curating on Steemit. But what if STEEM employs budget-setting?
I'm sure if the community budgeting follows some kind of vision, it would make much more sense for everybody including producers, curators, investors, and speculators. Or is something like a daily budget too authoritative? Anyway, if I can set it in terms of content, I would set it to the average of:-
a) Crypto-stuff @ 10%
b) Platform-marketing @ 10%
c) Platform-improvement @ 10%
d) Business-integration @ 10%
e) Platform-apps @ 20%
f) Other contents @ 40%
What will be yours? And let's say if I want to study the on-the-fly budgeting that has been happening all the while, what would be the best way to do this? Having a good view of what's happening to the daily distribution will be awesome.
Platform marketing 100%
LOL. i like your simple approach.
Marketing is very important nowadays and I would save at others 10% and give at marketing 20%. The other distribution I would leave so.
This post has been ranked within the top 10 most undervalued posts in the second half of Feb 16. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $19.36 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Feb 16 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.
My take is a bit different from @liberosist.
Platform Marketing 50%
Business Integration 50%.
STEEM desperately needs some other utility beyond commoditized voting power to scale.
if there's a decent food supplier accepting steem in almost all major cities in the world then it's a win lol