Let the system values the players of the game. I agree. If once the rules are set and it is always obvious there are going to be smarters who will early adapt and master the rule of the game early. So i take hegine as one of them. But fairness should be evaluated by the mis handling of the rules and also braking of them . But if a player wins by the rules. First amend the rules then try to avoid early advantage takers. That is to say nomatter what your voting power is some portion of reward should be evaluated by the number of voters. Lets say 20 to 25 % of the rewards should be by the number of upvotes you get then the rest should be by the power. Because some users of steem have less number or upvotes but self voting and a cyclical group voting makes reward high. And the other rule should be set by the number of upvotes limit should be set to one person for an individual account per week or three days or say a day.
If one account post 4 bloges in daily routeen. then voting in a week would be 28. But if we set the rules max number of upvotes to individual account to 15 then we will manage the unfair group rally.