Steem Flag Rewards Report - 8 Flagger Post - 2019-09-10 07:23

This post triggers once we have approved flags from 8 distinct flaggers via the SteemFlagRewards Abuse Fighting Community on our Discord

Flaggers have been designated as post beneficiaries. Our goal is to empower abuse fighting Steemians and promote a Steem that is less-friendly to abuse. It is simple. Building abuse fighters equals less abuse.

Would you like to delegate to the Steem Flag Rewards project and promote decentralized moderation? Here are some handy delegation links!

50 SP 100 SP 500 SP 1000 SP

The following witnesses are providing significant delegations to support the SFR mission. Please consider giving them your vote for witness. Steemconnect links included for convenience.

The following witnesses have shown considerable support and dedication against abuse. Please consider giving them your vote for witness. Steemconnect links included for convenience.

The following have shown considerable support and / or dedication to the cause and deserve a mention. Check out their blogs if you have the opportunity!
@mids106, @crokkon, @freebornangel, @slobberchops, @steevc, @underground

Flaggable Posts

LinkRewards RemainingCategory
Comment6.055 SBDbid bot abuse
Comment0.009 SBDbid bot abuse, spam
Comment0.097 SBDbid bot abuse, spam
Comment8.535 SBDbid bot abuse
Comment16.041 SBDbid bot abuse
Comment46.509 SBDspam
Comment8.624 SBDbid bot abuse
Comment0.713 SBDbid bot abuse
Comment4.603 SBDbid bot abuse
Comment5.884 SBDbid bot abuse

LinkFlaggerCategory
Comment@themarkymarkspam
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@themarkymarkplagiarism
Comment@elsiekjaycopy/paste
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, copy/paste
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, copy/paste
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjayplagiarism
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@themarkymarkspam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse, spam
Comment@themarkymarkplagiarism
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@elsiekjayspam
Comment@themarkymarkplagiarism
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@themarkymarkspam
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse, spam
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@themarkymarkbid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse
Comment@elsiekjaybid bot abuse

---

Mission Failed!


Reward removal at: 54.71 %

SFR Leaderboard

FlaggerSBD AmountRankImage
imacryptorick906.545 SBDF10 1 Quad
themarkymark499.174 SBDF10 1 Quad
gtg160.024 SBDF9 100 Tril
gamblingman153.22 SBDF9 100 Tril
mids106149.605 SBDF9 100 Tril
slobberchops135.404 SBDF9 100 Tril
ipromote69.776 SBDF9 100 Tril
mrkebab59.851 SBDF9 100 Tril
jacobtothe59.468 SBDF9 100 Tril
eonwarped47.682 SBDF8 10 Tril
kalif37.834 SBDF8 10 Tril
anthonyadavisii35.701 SBDF8 10 Tril
pjau35.48 SBDF8 10 Tril
rollingbones32.826 SBDF8 10 Tril
enforcer4831.514 SBDF8 10 Tril
steevc30.14 SBDF8 10 Tril
tushy26.374 SBDF8 10 Tril
joshman24.619 SBDF8 10 Tril
noblebot21.188 SBDF8 10 Tril
crokkon20.997 SBDF8 10 Tril

If you feel you've been wrongly flagged, check out @freezepeach, the flag abuse neutralizer. See the intro post for more details, or join the discord server.
Sort:  

Some of these links are from 1 month ago.

That's right. It's not a "recent news" but more of a "activity log" with beneficiaries set to those curators listed in that post, so the curators can be rewarded. It's true that if a month-old posts happen to be in "flaggable posts" makes this section somewhat useless.. I'm not sure if I remember well, but I think these posts are now manually triggered. Links to curated posts are collected and grouped per-curator and each curated link is rewarded only once, so if a curator has low activity it takes time to gather some reward. OTOH, if the curator has really high activity, maybe his reports are queued as well and rewarded on oldest-first basis :)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.26
TRX 0.11
JST 0.032
BTC 63510.75
ETH 3065.54
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.82