You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Charity drives on Steem, will not tolerate "Giving 100% of the liquid reward..." (while silently keeping the rest out of pure convenience/greed)
An anonymous vigilante flagging things they feel are against the ethos of Steemit will not help this community grow but will lead to its distruction.
I'd say it's the opposite, sometime it takes a level of anonymity to be able to say to things that are not popular (not that I'm anonymous BTW). As long as the person is communicative and explain it's action I don't see why you think pseudonimity is a problem.
The use of the downvote is all about effectiveness. Upvoting positive things and turning a blind eye on abuses is pure complacency.
How is advocating for accountability and openness when taking money on behalf of charities indiscriminate?
I only mention your account as anonymous as you have no profile pic of any kind, no external web link for any form of external verification. I support your right to have that and agree if you are going to take a personal stand on something I believe you should also be accountable for your actions.
I am all for accountability and verification. Whenever I make a donation from one of my posts highlighting the charity or cause i am supporting I post proof of contribution, and in the case of KIVA regular updates to the repayment and redistribution of those funds.
I am a mere minnow here on Steemit and you are a mighty Whale, I realise more and more what the minnows believe is overruled by a small group of whales and don’t know if that makes for a healthy community and sounds more like an oligarchy at best.
i am Fucking @transisto sis and mother
i am Fucking @transisto sis and mother