You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Time To Wake Up and Fix Steem's Voting Problem
Time To [...] Fix Steem's Voting Problem
There is no 'fix' known.
The closest I've seen to a credible proposal is from @trafalgar (mild superlinear, increased downvoting incentive, increased curation) and that is still highly speculative, and arguably is not even a credible proposal because no one is stepping forward to implement it, nor is there really a process to implement anything that isn't on the Steemit roadmap (and this isn't).
But, hey, you managed to generate $644.60 (as of right now) of reward with a provocative post that got to Trending (with a little help from some [self-voting and bidbot] friends) that like all the others will generally result in no real change. I guess that helps a bit with your 9000 SBD deficit.
Yes, i think his proposal is good to try out. If we're flying too close to the Sun, or too far out, there's nothing that we can do to salvage anything. The heart of it is to balance out individual autonomy (user satisfaction) and consensus (a working content platform). We've already experienced both ends: linear, and n^2.. now time for something in the middle, along with the other minor tweaks as you've stated.
Yes i'm happy to be able to generate this amount from being provocative, but I really hope to have reasoned this well enough for a move away from inaction. Maybe i'll repeat the post in different languages lol