You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Diversifying Curation Reward
tl;dr
just joking... actually I read it twice and still have NO (real) idea what you are talking about. Especially it seems to me that your proposal does not solve the problem of self voting by the guilds, which is mainly distorting the for-content voting they are involved in (or should be).
Still glad to know, that there are people doing the maths ( I am not fit for that ).
At the end it will be key to finally find a stable solution that is not subject to change all the time. Theses changes are one of the main reasons investors are hesitant...
Hoping for a lot of discussion here, to learn more about the maths behind the system.
Exactly. And they are also hesitant to "invest" when their only reasonable "returns" are continually being stripped away without producing the claimed results - which are usually the promises of more users, more investors, more development, and a better overall experience on the platform.
It is not directly related self-voting. But notable thing is these for-profit users/bots don't much care about these self-votings. If a post will give them higher profit, they will vote for, and exacerbate the problem.