You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Voting Abuse and Ineffective Curation: A proposal for blockchain-level change
I have a second proposal after reading @timcliff's comment. We could also try to make a second type of delegation, where rewards are split. This could allow me to effectively hire a curator. I'll delegate steem, you get 10-20% of the rewards, and I'll get the other 80%. Something like that may allow for better curation without a whale having to be entirely philanthropic about it.
If you want quality curation you will have to be a bit more generous than that. I would say along the lines of 40/60. Delegator would get 60%, and curator would keep 40%. Delegators can set up their own rules and guidelines what would constitute as a quality curation, which could even include downvoting abuse/plagiarism/etc. This kind of movement just might make the platform work for everybody.
This could work! I think @geekgirl already requested to have some SP delegated to her for curation purposes somewhere here in the comments. I believe she'd be up for this, an probably many other as well.
I think curation is the single most important factor here on the platform going forward. The rewards, the tools for filtering and the incentives probably all deserve still a lot of development to reach the goal of really rewarding quality content.
This is a great idea.
That's pretty brilliant. Hiring curators. YES!
Sign me up, Boss!
Srsly.