Thanks for your clarification but i think a weighting system of say 40-60 or even 30-70 each being the judges to votes ratio would go a long way in encouraging quality submissions. A participant who knows he has the numbers would then consider to do quality so that he doesn't lose out points in the quality assessment. And if he thinks his votes source can do all the work required, then he can drop any trash and work on his voters. I don't think a 40-60 ratio means full centralization.