Philosophy and Science // Inequalities and principles of integration. Analysis and reflection

Today's man keeps asking himself the same questions from centuries ago, all of which revolve around the existential environment, but with many things to prove. The phenomena that occur in our nature give cause for us to think that at this stage of the 21st century all or most of the questions posed have been answered throughout the evolutionary process of human knowledge, however we know that there are still many questions to be resolved , since various enigmas are still being questioned, such as:

Where we come from?

How can we predict with certainty our future on the planet?

These and many other aspects that are very changeable in our society makes us reflect at every moment on how great and immense is the knowledge that man has harvested throughout his history, it is a knowledge that has left a legacy within science and philosophy, nature itself, together with all its mysteries generate an infinite knowledge, in which the laws that govern the behavior of our universe are enigmatic and changing so that we can understand them all within the field of expectations of philosophy and science .

Image source

Science and its postulates are born of the existing need to think and reason that man has to seek explanation to all the questions that arise from his precious thinking, all this leads me to reflect that, to be able to give satisfactory answers and demonstration to all and each of the questions traced through its history, man needs to investigate and support each finding found and solved, so he feels the need to separate some features and aspects, to be able to separate the new foundations of science to the philosophy.

Although certain features and aspects of science needed to be separated from philosophy, it is necessary to make clear that the unborn science of philosophy can not be totally unrelated to philosophy, so my general objective in this publication is to analyze a series of aspects that describe the elements that separate the philosophy of science, but also mention and analyze the features that are necessary to preserve in which science and philosophy are still united.

Image source

Analysis: Traits of similarity and inequalities in progress between philosophy and science

Once the ideal scenario of separation has been achieved, philosophy and science show the way to approach the work of knowledge oriented to the development of those interested in science, these characters who were initially formed under an idealist thought, were interested then to investigate and demonstrate what inductive logical thinking could not solve, this change in my opinion arose from the need to find answers and more convincing solutions on questions that for the old era did not have demonstrable answers, knowing that natural science was an integral part of the philosophy to then separate within just and necessary reasons, thus forming a current of thought inspired by describing a world full of scientific shortcomings, being able to find in this new order a program where, although there are differences between philosophy and science, these must converge on a common good where science continues preserving the characteristics of pure thought that only endures within philosophy.

There is so much similarity that philosophy and science still hold, that many of the questions that were asked in ancient times, today fit perfectly into modern scientific thinking and philosophy. Always seeking to differentiate and at the same time bring together philosophy and science, we find characteristics in it where the new way of innovating in science prevails, where the search for the true essence of true knowledge seeks significance within a set of opinions and postulates of personal character. In this characteristic process, logic plays a fundamental role as a methodological guide in the generation of scientific knowledge.

Under a section in which everything we investigate is demonstrable, it is necessary to start from a base of laws and statements that we consider certain by deductive logic, and that later in the form in which it is demonstrated took the form of a scientific character, this principle was who took science in its principles, always trying to separate from the philosophy where idealism was the protagonist of these scenarios. In spite of this, the inductive reasoning took a back seat compared to the deductive one. It is Euclid who embodied an axiomatic system inspired by Aristotelian logic, in which I try to summarize all the basic information of geometry, using a series of postulates establishing parameters for scientific methodology could remain in force today and perhaps a few years more .

As all these advances in thinking and reasoning were advanced, many of them became changing and controversial, due to the paradigm of their new laws, which makes us reflect that these changes are just and necessary in the transformation of the new order to perceive science and philosophy.

Image source

Reflection

If we take into account that science is the daughter of philosophy, then as good listeners of this type of process, we have to understand that every son moves away from his father to take different characteristics that help him to take his own personality, This same feeling emerged science, separating philosophical thought, where they are demonstrative elements with research features that managed to renew a new philosophy called science, always retaining the characteristics of its parent philosophy.