I did enjoy my time as in the curation team - we always entertained each other when it was our day to curate. It never felt like we were working alone.

Unfortunately though, many greeedy users seek the power and their greed only grows. I've already noticed another "nomination of the week" go to a family member. One for me to keep an eye on in their next report which will arrive soon.

I’ve been out of the curation team for the past three months because of my eye health and the heavy workload at the office.

It's a very time consuming role. I'm not familiar with the latest criteria (clubs, etc.) but towards the end of my time doing it, my preferred content generally didn't fit the criteria. Perhaps one day, I'll apply again... although with my DAO project, I have the opportunity to make a difference via a different route.

Even if Achievement 1 were implemented, cheating would still be a possibility. Users could potentially register using multiple identities and manipulate the accounts to gain an unfair advantage.

Yes, this still happens.

Therefore, it appears that a tool capable of detecting users with multiple accounts is required. This tool could potentially identify the MAC address of the device used, allowing the curation team to be aware of potential support for the same user with a different identity.

@wakeupkitty's already mentioned the anonymity and privacy. The longer standing users and many of the witnesses would never allow this to happen for that reason.